男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / View

Time to close gap between public view and reality of climate change

By Op Rana | China Daily | Updated: 2015-02-02 07:49

People ignorant or in denial of climate change and climate science are not new. Even the division between scientists on climate change is not new, although most (about 97 percent) active climate scientists believe humans are a major cause of climate change, while the number is "radically different" among economic geologists, or scientists who (according to Naomi Klein) study natural formations so that they can be commercially exploited.

Despite the contradictions and complications, we expect people in the world's most advanced country to accord some importance to, if not respect, the findings of scientists. But a Pew Research Center poll released on Jan 29 says American public and scientists hold vastly different views on climate change, genetically modified (GM) foods and (not surprisingly) evolution.

About 87 percent of the scientists who responded to the Pew poll said human activity was the main cause of climate change, but only 50 percent of the general public agreed with them. Disturbingly, about 25 of the Americans polled said there was no "solid evidence" to prove that the climate was warming - the percentage of such skeptics in a 2009 survey was only 11 percent.

The divide over GM foods was wider, with 88 percent of the scientists surveyed saying they were safe to eat compared with 37 percent of the public. The gap between scientists and the general public on evolution was wide too, with 98 percent of the scientists saying humans had evolved over time, compared with 65 percent of the public.

The difference in the beliefs (based on evidence, empirical or otherwise) of scientists and the public should not be surprising, because about 53 percent of the "economic scientists" do not believe in human-caused climate change.

The fact is, as Klein says in her latest book, This Changes Everything: "... we are all inclined to denial when the truth is too costly - whether emotionally, intellectually, or financially. As Upton Sinclair ... observed: 'It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.'"

The Pew survey results are not surprising because there is a connection between the refusal to "accept the science of climate change and social and economic privilege". Most of the climate change deniers are not only conservative but also "white and male" - a group with higher than average income. Worse, members of this group are more prone to be highly confident of their views even if they are scientifically wrong.

The Pew study reveals the difference between perception (of the American public) and reality (which scientists, based on empirical evidence, believe in). If we juxtapose the American public with the people in the rest of the world, we are most likely to get the same result, but that doesn't change the reality, that the planet and its attributes are not what they should have been in natural circumstances and that humans are responsible for that because they are the only beings who have the power to alter it.

And as Alan Leshner, the chief executive of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, a leading scientific organization that publishes the journal Science, said: "Speaking up for the importance of science to society is our only hope, and scientists must not shy away from engaging with the public, even on the most polarizing science-based topics." Factors, including political views on climate change and religious beliefs on evolution, are out to trump science because of lack of scientific understanding among people.

This is a dangerous trend in times when science should be ruling the minds of the people. This trend needs to be countered with the help of education programs sponsored by governments, especially governments in countries like China, which know what the reality of climate change is and how it can be mitigated.

Will China, and other countries most threatened by climate change, take up this challenge?

The author is a senior editor with China Daily. oprana@hotmail.com

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 高州市| 巴林左旗| 遂平县| 丹江口市| 中西区| 湘潭市| 探索| 左权县| 雅江县| 隆回县| 遂川县| 富锦市| 达尔| 神池县| 五指山市| 库伦旗| 若尔盖县| 嘉义市| 文安县| 南澳县| 仁布县| 大英县| 萨嘎县| 邻水| 西平县| 尚志市| 大埔区| 贵州省| 永泰县| 乡城县| 岑巩县| 乐都县| 兴城市| 安福县| 通许县| 云和县| 宁乡县| 抚松县| 扎囊县| 信宜市| 凉城县| 门头沟区| 秭归县| 神池县| 夏邑县| 怀来县| 庆元县| 灵台县| 松阳县| 鹤壁市| 龙井市| 彭阳县| 噶尔县| 平定县| 榕江县| 余庆县| 乐昌市| 盖州市| 宁夏| 东平县| 监利县| 静宁县| 常熟市| 萨迦县| 门头沟区| 安义县| 祁阳县| 呈贡县| 万宁市| 巩义市| 金阳县| 前郭尔| 民乐县| 衡阳县| 江山市| 蓬安县| 兴宁市| 酉阳| 社会| 高唐县| 浙江省| 瑞昌市|