男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / View

Telecom giants should cut roaming charges or they will lose public trust

China Daily | Updated: 2015-05-22 07:32

THE DOMESTIC TELECOMMUNICATION giants insist on charging high roaming fees even when the user remains inside the country, which has become a media focus. Comments:

It might be reasonable to collect international roaming fees because telecom companies must rent facilities and equipment in other countries, but there is hardly any additional costs for them when a cellphone user travels within China. As the national telecom giants have their own facilities that cover the whole nation, at least domestic cross-city roaming fees should be canceled.

xinhuanet.com, quoting a former senior executive of the China Mobile institute, May 21

The telecom giants might be reluctant to lower the roaming fees, but this will be only for the short term, as the central government has already vowed to open the telecommunications market and promote equal competition. If the current giants, relying on their monopolies, insist on charging high roaming fees, they will only loose public trust, which will be fatal for them in the coming competition.

Daily Sunshine, May 21

It is already an irreversible trend that roaming fees are falling. In response, the higher leadership should lower their profit requirements of the State-owned companies that dominate the industry and make clear what they should do.

Shu Huaying, a professor at Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, May 21

Whether telecom giants admit it or not, telecommunications should be considered a basic social service today. Telecommunications is a closed market run by State-owned enterprises, and the giants that monopolize it should shoulder their social responsibilities and benefit society.

Zhang Yi, CEO of iiMedia Research Group, May 21

There are so many reasons to require telecom giants to lower or even cancel their roaming fees, but they, as monopolies, have never made such a move, except in 2008 when pressure from the government forced them to. The central government needs to intervene again, so they do what they should do.

Fu Liang, a telecommunications industry analyst, May 20

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 佛冈县| 神农架林区| 万盛区| 陆良县| 文水县| 外汇| 建瓯市| 莎车县| 竹山县| 日土县| 五家渠市| 禄丰县| 达日县| 天镇县| 宜阳县| 西林县| 阿坝县| 京山县| 新建县| 克东县| 溧阳市| 罗江县| 义乌市| 襄樊市| 祁连县| 滨州市| 鲁甸县| 沭阳县| 西和县| 惠水县| 盐山县| 华池县| 唐海县| 固安县| 都安| 夹江县| 遂溪县| 葫芦岛市| 晋江市| 黔东| 宁乡县| 庆安县| 高要市| 腾冲县| 仙居县| 开平市| 日土县| 青河县| 宁津县| 灵宝市| 庆元县| 江西省| 芷江| 炉霍县| 瑞安市| 仁布县| 高安市| 河间市| 辽中县| 区。| 石楼县| 卢湾区| 京山县| 三台县| 达孜县| 聂荣县| 桐梓县| 峨山| 凤庆县| 浦北县| 镇巴县| 盈江县| 南平市| 凤翔县| 余庆县| 礼泉县| 诏安县| 微山县| 乐业县| 巴中市| 连江县| 上杭县|