男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Business

BOC weighs legal options against US court ruling

By Li Xiang | China Daily | Updated: 2015-12-03 06:49

Lender slapped with daily fines of $50,000 for withholding client account information

Bank of China Ltd is seeking to appeal against a United States court order that imposes $50,000 daily fine on it for withholding information, its legal advisers said on Wednesday.

The State-owned lender was held in contempt by a US court for refusing to provide account details of Chinese customers accused of selling counterfeit luxury goods. The US court said the daily fines would be imposed from next Tuesday, unless BOC complies with the subpoena request for client information.

BOC has been involved in the legal dispute that stemmed from a case in 2010. Gucci, the luxury brand of Paris-based Kering SA, sued owners and operators of a Chinese website for trademark infringement, online sales of imitation handbags and other items.

The bank, which is not a defendant in the Gucci case, has claimed that it has been caught in between the conflicts of the legal systems of China and the US.

Jiang Ying, a lawyer at Allen & Overy, the law firm representing BOC, said that the fine is "unfair" for the bank, which is "innocently involved" in the case and it would put the bank in a dilemma of violating Chinese laws if it has to comply with the US laws.

The incident underscored the growing legal disputes facing Chinese financial institutions in the US under the controversial Long-Arm Statue, a legal provision that allows US courts to exercise jurisdiction over foreign entities, provided that the prospective defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with the US, legal experts said.

Jiang said that the involved parties should be able to invoke the multilateral Hague Evidence Convention to resolve the dispute. The Hague procedure enables the plaintiff to obtain evidence, including bank account information, under the Chinese legal procedures.

Had Gucci opted to use the Hague Convention, they would have obtained the information they seek long before now, Jiang said.

Gucci also has the option to sue the defendants in China and obtain Chinese court's assistance in obtaining information and freezing accounts.

Jiang said that she is aware of at least three cases where the counsel representing Gucci successfully used Chinese courts to do so in recent years.

While it is hard to guess whether BOC will win its appeal, Jiang said the case will far reaching impact on Chinese companies and all foreign businesses in the US affected by the long-arm jurisdiction.

Shi Jinjuan, a partner of law firm Dacheng Dentons in Shanghai said the Bank of China dispute represents a major legal challenge in information disclosure for Chinese companies. It could also hit future Chinese investments in the US.

"If the court ruling goes against the bank, Chinese companies may become more cautious or even less willing to invest, set up offices or list their shares in the US," she said.

lixiang@chinadaily.com.cn

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 贡嘎县| 罗江县| 叶城县| 佛冈县| 藁城市| 稻城县| 农安县| 竹山县| 聂拉木县| 镇远县| 武冈市| 荣成市| 肃宁县| 九龙坡区| 托里县| 旌德县| 遵义市| 大丰市| 涿鹿县| 平湖市| 绥滨县| 广昌县| 吉林省| 阜新市| 峨边| 铜鼓县| 巴彦县| 桐乡市| 思南县| 鄂托克前旗| 朝阳区| 隆昌县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 兴安县| 华宁县| 镇坪县| 敖汉旗| 灵寿县| 高安市| 宜阳县| 孟津县| 卢氏县| 苏尼特左旗| 祁东县| 新乐市| 樟树市| 乐东| 德昌县| 宿松县| 元氏县| 新建县| 钟山县| 沅陵县| 鹤山市| 炎陵县| 合水县| 玛纳斯县| 神木县| 洛扎县| 瓮安县| 凤山县| 翁牛特旗| 澜沧| 文水县| 大关县| 中卫市| 托克托县| 隆回县| 张家界市| 五台县| 栾川县| 依兰县| 平山县| 连云港市| 辽阳市| 壶关县| 抚松县| 汉阴县| 交城县| 吴堡县| 临西县| 西林县|