男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / View

Cutting overcapacity needs all countries' work

By Xu Man | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2016-09-04 14:57

Imposing anti-dumping duties on China's steel exports will only protect others' backward production systems

China's steel sector, like in the rest of the world, faces the problem of falling demand because of the feeble global economic recovery, although measures taken by the Chinese government to eliminate overcapacity seem to be working.

But some countries have turned a blind eye to these facts and still blame China for the excess supply of steel products in international markets, and have launched anti-dumping investigations into Chinese steel products with the aim of using protectionist measures to solve the problems of their steel sectors.

Instead of falling prey to prejudice, these countries should join China to work out targeted measures to reduce overcapacity in the steel industry.

For a long time, China's steel industry focused on domestic demand, not on exports. The nation's accelerating urbanization, the development of its manufacturing sector and its expanded infrastructure construction mean the demand for steel is still healthy.

China became a net steel exporter from a net steel importer only 10 years ago, and exports have accounted for only 10 percent of its total steel output in the past decade, far lower than the 40 percent ratio of some developed countries.

To restrict the export of a high energy-consuming product like steel, the government has even raised export tariffs and reduced export tax rebates, becoming the world's only major steel producer to have such measures in place.

Reckless protectionist measures will not help resolve the global steel overproduction issue.

In May, the United States launched an anti-dumping investigation into some of China's major steel manufacturers, claiming they use unfair means to export steel products to the US. Some other economies, such as the European Union, Chile, Vietnam, Australia, India, Colombia, Canada and Malaysia followed suit.

Such restrictive trade measures contravene the principle of fair market competition.

China's steel exports to the US and the EU account for only a small part of their steel imports. Therefore, the imposition of anti-dumping duties on China's exports will help protect their backward production systems without solving the problem of their steel enterprises' weak competitiveness.

China's steel enterprises are highly competitive in the global market and their products are valued for their high cost-to-performance ratio. A large part of Chinese steel exports have formed a deeply complementary relationship with the steel producers of the importing countries and thus have promoted local economic development.

The government has never denied the overcapacity in its steel industry. Instead, it has implemented policies and regulations since 2013 to guide local governments and enterprises to absorb their production surplus.

In February, the State Council issued a guideline to make overall policy arrangements to reduce the country's steel overcapacity, vowing to cut 100 million to 150 million metric tons of crude steel capacity in the next five years from the level mapped out during the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-15).

For this year alone, the plan is to reduce 45 million tons of overcapacity, and by the end of July, 47 percent of that target had been realized. Now, the government plans to take forceful measures to ensure the full-year goal is realized.

The Belt and Road Initiative advocated by China is also aimed at strengthening infrastructure construction in the countries that become part of it and at promoting interconnectivity. The smooth implementation of the initiative will help drive up the global demand for steel products and thus promote cooperation and realize win-win results.

Given that in the era of globalization, steel overcapacity is not a problem of any one country, be it the highest producer, all countries should play their respective roles and work together to address this thorny issue.

The author is a researcher with the

Ministry of Commerce's Chinese

Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 邵东县| 盐津县| 交城县| 甘孜县| 吉木萨尔县| 宁国市| 彰化市| 宜春市| 驻马店市| 于田县| 泰宁县| 永州市| 读书| 江孜县| 通化市| 彰武县| 铜山县| 游戏| 理塘县| 宿州市| 彭阳县| 珠海市| 若羌县| 时尚| 乐陵市| 曲麻莱县| 林州市| 凤庆县| 凌源市| 五寨县| 阿城市| 辰溪县| 长乐市| 商南县| 北京市| 阳春市| 松江区| 称多县| 日照市| 资中县| 龙川县| 余姚市| 英吉沙县| 潢川县| 五华县| 且末县| 贡觉县| 南陵县| 和田市| 兰州市| 四子王旗| 精河县| 左权县| 泰安市| 文水县| 双桥区| 商都县| 大丰市| 宁远县| 临湘市| 桃源县| 威信县| 游戏| 峨边| 沧源| 闵行区| 青州市| 牡丹江市| 秦安县| 逊克县| 安福县| 嘉黎县| 南宁市| 阿拉善盟| 桂阳县| 庄河市| 铁岭市| 黑龙江省| 安多县| 邮箱| 白玉县| 赤壁市|