中國(guó)網(wǎng)站品牌欄目（頻道）
|
 The idea that our brains are controlled by our gender is outdated and wrong, according to Professor Gina Rippon.
|
|
Some days the opposite sex seems so different, you can almost believe that they come from another planet. Indeed, the theory that we are all hard-wired by our gender has proved so popular that a book on the subject, Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus, became an international best-seller. Now a leading neuroscientist says women's brain power is no different to men's after all – and we are actually incredibly similar when it comes to intellect. Professor Gina Rippon says the idea that our brains are controlled by our gender is outdated and wrong. And she has even accused researchers of producing findings that can be used to support the old prejudice that women are not men's intellectual equals. 'There is increasing concern within the neuroscience community about the misinterpretation and abuse of our findings on the links between brain structure and behaviour,' she said. 'This "neurohype" is designed to support stereotypes and to suggest that there is a major biological and structural difference in the brains of men and women that explains their social roles and status. 'This is nonsense. There may be some very small differences between the genders but the similarities are far, far greater.’ Professor Rippon's comments follow a spate of books promoting the idea that there are structural differences between men's and women's brains. However, the professor from Aston University in Birmingham, argues that although today's researchers can observe the minute workings of the brain, they are still asking questions that appear to be inspired by old-fashioned male-female stereotypes. Take a look at the characters in programmes such as Mad Men, the TV series about a 1960s advertising agency, and you'll get the idea. 'Throughout history, biological explanations have been used as weapons to explain and maintain social differences,' she added. 'In Victorian times, scientists suggested women thought with a different part of their brain from men. In the 1950s they came up with the idea that women's "inferior" thinking was controlled by their hormones. Now the idea is that men and women have different brain structures –but there is no real evidence for any of it.' (Read by Renee Haines. Renee Haines is a journalist at the China Daily Web site.) (Agencies) |
有時(shí)候男人和女人看起來(lái)是如此不同，你幾乎都以為他們來(lái)自另外一個(gè)星球。 事實(shí)上，我們天生就由自己的性別決定這一理論非常受歡迎，有關(guān)這一主題的書(shū)——《男人來(lái)自火星，女人來(lái)自金星》成為了全球暢銷(xiāo)書(shū)。 如今一位頂級(jí)神經(jīng)學(xué)家稱(chēng)，女性的腦力與男性差別并不大，在智力方面男女實(shí)際上是驚人地相近。吉娜?瑞彭教授說(shuō)，認(rèn)為我們的大腦由我們的性別控制的想法是過(guò)時(shí)的，也是錯(cuò)誤的。 她譴責(zé)一些研究者“制造”研究結(jié)果來(lái)支持女性智力不如男性的老偏見(jiàn)。 她說(shuō)：“在神經(jīng)科學(xué)界中，有些人會(huì)曲解和濫用我們?cè)谟嘘P(guān)大腦結(jié)構(gòu)和行為之間的聯(lián)系方面的發(fā)現(xiàn)，這一現(xiàn)象越來(lái)越讓人擔(dān)心。” “制造這種‘神經(jīng)夸大論’目的是為了支持固有成見(jiàn)，表明男性和女性的大腦存在著重大的生理上和構(gòu)造上的不同，從而解釋男女的社會(huì)角色和地位的不同。 “這是無(wú)稽之談。男女之間可能存在著一些很小的差異，但是相似性要多得多。” 在瑞彭教授發(fā)表這些言論之前，已出版了許多宣揚(yáng)男性和女性在大腦構(gòu)造上有區(qū)別的書(shū)。 不過(guò)，這位來(lái)自伯明翰市阿斯頓大學(xué)的教授說(shuō)，雖然現(xiàn)在的研究人員們可以觀察到大腦的細(xì)微運(yùn)作，但是他們的論題似乎依然受到對(duì)男女的老式成見(jiàn)的影響。 看看講述20世紀(jì)60年代一家廣告公司的《廣告狂人》電視節(jié)目里的人物吧，你就明白了。 她補(bǔ)充說(shuō)：“縱觀歷史，生理上的理由一直被用作武器來(lái)解釋和維持社會(huì)上的差異。” “在維多利亞時(shí)代，科學(xué)家們指出女性思考時(shí)使用的大腦部位與男性不同。20世紀(jì)50年代他們認(rèn)為女性的思考能力‘弱’是因?yàn)槭芩齻兊暮蔂柮煽刂啤，F(xiàn)在又認(rèn)為男性和女性的大腦構(gòu)造不同——但任何論斷都沒(méi)有確切的證據(jù)。” 相關(guān)閱讀 全球調(diào)查：女性比男性擅長(zhǎng)理財(cái) 巾幗不讓須眉 女性領(lǐng)導(dǎo)能力優(yōu)于男性 （中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)網(wǎng)英語(yǔ)點(diǎn)津 陳丹妮 編輯：馮明惠） |
|
Vocabulary: hard-wired: 天生的 a spate of: 一連串，大量的 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
