男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
   
 

China and U.S.: IP “Competition” and “Cooperation”

By Tommy Zhang(China IP)
Updated: 2012-10-31

As the world’s largest developing country and the largest developed country, China and the United States maintain a relationship that can affect the political and economic order of the entire world. China-U.S. relationship is a combination of competition and cooperation and this unique feature has become a consensus of all parties. The “competing yet cooperating” relationship between China and the U.S. is also fully embodied in the field of intellectual property adjudication. The legislative, judicial and administrative organs of both China and the U.S. have the same targets, including establishing fair and reasonable IP system and mechanisms, effectively protecting the interests of right holders under the conditions of a market economy, encouraging and protecting innovation and attracting more innovative talents and businesses. At the same time, both of the two countries are sparing no effort to seek the maximum protection over the intellectual properties of their citizens and companies, so conflicts of interests and competition between the two countries are inevitable.

In the backdrop of world’s economic integration, the two countries see more and more mutual investments and the two economies have become increasingly interdependent. One country’s loss can cause larger losses for both sides. However, China and the United States are fundamentally different in their legal systems and institutional framework. Even with the same targets, the two countries have very different legal provisions. The two sides should strengthen communication and cooperation, fully understand each other’s judicial system and eliminate misinterpretations and misunderstandings due to differences in cultural and social systems in order to better achieve the fundamental purposes and values of their respective legal systems.

The “United States-China Intellectual Property Adjudication Conference” shows that the two countries are moving towards cooperation and development in the intellectual property field. The conference attracted judges from United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, officials of United States Patent and Trademark Office, renowned American lawyers, and the U.S. business representatives. It also attracted judges from the Chinese courts, academic experts, representatives of well-known Chinese enterprises and equally respected Chinese lawyers.

As a professional magazine committed to international IP exchange and communication, while applauding for the conference, we are more willing to become a participant and witness of the Sino-US IP cooperation and development!



The J-Innovation

Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

Volunteer team bails out busy court

Government supports unique intellectual property fund

IP service providers showcase products

Experts call for standardization of IP services

主站蜘蛛池模板: 锦州市| 遵义县| 遂宁市| 华容县| 广平县| 乌拉特前旗| 德昌县| 腾冲县| 华蓥市| 婺源县| 浪卡子县| 屯门区| 敦煌市| 娄底市| 高邑县| 淅川县| 太康县| 伊通| 百色市| 原平市| 澄城县| 龙海市| 图木舒克市| 金乡县| 通州区| 加查县| 龙江县| 罗城| 张家港市| 西充县| 乌苏市| 商都县| 绥宁县| 陆良县| 宁城县| 锦州市| 邳州市| 登封市| 利辛县| 漳平市| 安平县| 大同市| 内江市| 石河子市| 新化县| 喀喇沁旗| 邛崃市| 金昌市| 巴林左旗| 当涂县| 通山县| 湾仔区| 福州市| 诸暨市| 定远县| 南和县| 永靖县| 师宗县| 峡江县| 达拉特旗| 苍梧县| 嘉定区| 息烽县| 张家界市| 余庆县| 积石山| 怀远县| 秭归县| 蚌埠市| 齐齐哈尔市| 桐城市| 同心县| 米脂县| 普宁市| 佛冈县| 安远县| 阜康市| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 文登市| 清水河县| 平舆县| 安化县|