男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

We have launched Eemail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
You Are Here: Home > Research > Public Administration and Human Resources> What's New

Public Administration and Human Resources

Innovate Social Governance Methods and Improve Grassroots Level Service -- A Case Study on Deqing County’s Practice of Social Governance at Grassroots Level in the New Era (No.58, 2018)

2018-05-23

By Long Haibo & Shen Yuan, Research Team on “Innovative Development of Social Governance in China”, Institute of Public Administration and Human Resources, DRC

Research Report No.58, 2018 (Total 5333) 2018-3-29

Abstract: At present, the overall performance of social governance at the grassroots level is generally sound. Local governments have shifted the focus of social governance down to the grassroots level, forming a governance model featured by gridded management, the coordination between communities, social organizations and social workers and collaborative governance. Deqing county in Chaozhou city of Zhejiang province has formed some effective measures by innovating social governance methods and constantly improving self-governance capabilities and management service at the grassroots level. On the one hand, it has invited some local worthies as consultants to participate in democratic consultations and give advises on village affairs and strived to cultivate an urban-rural integration model for social governance based on the rule of law, the rule of virtue and self-governance. On the other hand, through the establishment of the “happy community” center, the county government has streamlined the different functions of the community center, and enhanced the overall service level. For future development, the county government needs to push forward the social governance work at the grassroots level in the new era. First, it needs to pay more attention to the governance effectiveness, and focus on leveraging the incentive mechanism; second, efforts need to be made to consolidate the foundation of democratic consultations and build a new interactive relation between the government and the community; third, it needs to further flesh out the top-level design of policies and realize the integration of grassroots service.

Key words: social governance, multiple and collaborative governance, township counselor conference, “happy community” center

 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 浦东新区| 荃湾区| 花垣县| 望都县| 丹阳市| 永仁县| 旺苍县| 莲花县| 定西市| 南靖县| 隆子县| 枣强县| 湖口县| 新竹县| 嘉定区| 玉环县| 宁晋县| 麟游县| 洪雅县| 常德市| 张家川| 奉新县| 富阳市| 古丈县| 榆中县| 安西县| 霍邱县| 雷州市| 会泽县| 务川| 兰坪| 亚东县| 东海县| 霞浦县| 大石桥市| 临漳县| 达拉特旗| 兴和县| 英超| 泗洪县| 定陶县| 大姚县| 上思县| 灵川县| 天峻县| 阿拉善左旗| 临城县| 乐安县| 修水县| 新乐市| 恩施市| 黑龙江省| 五原县| 桂平市| 蛟河市| 孝感市| 玉屏| 江门市| 雷波县| 德令哈市| 普洱| 沙雅县| 合水县| 榆社县| 余姚市| 寻乌县| 稷山县| 绩溪县| 普陀区| 安徽省| 泾阳县| 仲巴县| 左权县| 台江县| 积石山| 当阳市| 平陆县| 新昌县| 左云县| 房产| 花莲县| 上饶市|