男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

We have launched E-mail Alert service,subscribers can receive the latest catalogues free of charge

 
 
You Are Here: Home > Reports

China’s Traditional Governance Philosophy and Models: Evolution and Implications (Special Issue, No.82, 2019)

( drc ) 2019-12-09

By Li Jianwei & Wang Weijin, Research Team on “Innovative Development of Social Governance in China”, Institute of Public Administration and Human Resources, DRC

Research Report, Special Issue, No.82, 2019 (Total 1710)

2019-10-18

Abstract: China’s traditional governance philosophy and models have evolved continuously. Its national administrative mechanism changed from the enfeoffment system in the Western Zhou Dynasty (1046 BC – 771 BC) to the prefecture system in Qin ( 221 BC – 206 BC) and Han Dynasties (206 BC – 220 AD) and beyond. Specifically, the central governance evolved from aristocratic separation of powers under the Zhou dynasty’s enfeoffment system, to centralized power and absolute monarchy in Qin and Han Dynasties, and to absolute monarchy based on the Three Departments and Six Ministries System and separation as well as checks and balances of power after Sui (581 – 618 AD) and Tang dynasties (618 - 907 AD). While the local governance evolved from rule of rites by township leaders in Zhou Dynasty to neighborhood governance under township guidance in Qin and Han Dynasties, neighborhood leader governance with township assistance in Sui and Tang Dynasties, and the neighborhood administrative system after Song Dynasty (960 – 1279 AD). The rule of virtue featured by Confucianism and the rule of law represented by Legalism had both been improved in the governance practice, so that the former forms a crucial shell enfolding the latter at its core. This becomes what is called the chiefly virtue-led but moderately penalty-featured traditional Chinese governance philosophy. Since the 1911 Revolution started the modernization drive of China’s national governance, China has gradually established a modern governance system fused with the idea of Western democratic decentralization and the essence of traditional Chinese governance. To promote the modernization of China’s governance system and enhance its national governance capability, we need to give full play to the positive role of traditional culture and governance philosophy.

Key words: social governance, governance philosophy, historical evolution

 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 乌兰浩特市| 锡林浩特市| 黄平县| 聂荣县| 扎鲁特旗| 长岛县| 潢川县| 获嘉县| 台北县| 本溪| 乌兰县| 江川县| 青川县| 冀州市| 寻甸| 岳普湖县| 西昌市| 武安市| 视频| 巴南区| 江门市| 顺昌县| 广昌县| 婺源县| 湟源县| 凤凰县| 清苑县| 凤翔县| 宜君县| 伊金霍洛旗| 潢川县| 洛川县| 堆龙德庆县| 安龙县| 米林县| 松溪县| 阜新| 鹤峰县| 长岭县| 土默特右旗| 吴堡县| 甘德县| 林甸县| 绥阳县| 涿州市| 四平市| 阿城市| 阿克| 吉木乃县| 兰西县| 元朗区| 鄱阳县| 长春市| 黄龙县| 延津县| 榆林市| 朝阳县| 巴中市| 大姚县| 怀化市| 文山县| 安平县| 南郑县| 营山县| 略阳县| 博客| 彭山县| 甘南县| 福泉市| 安阳市| 常宁市| 惠安县| 曲靖市| 西城区| 天长市| 古浪县| 东宁县| 吉木萨尔县| 海城市| 平泉县| 巩留县| 台南市|