男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
 
   
中文
 
Home> Local
Controversy surrounds publicizing offenders' personal info
By Guo Rui ( China Daily )
Updated: 2010-07-19

Public notices revealing names in prostitution case stir debate

WUHAN - A public notice disclosing the personal information of people involved in a prostitution case in Hubei's provincial capital has aroused national controversy over privacy issues.

The Hongshan police sub-bureau pasted a special public notice about a June 26 raid of a local massage parlor along the streets in the Chenjiawan community on July 7.

The notice said the sex worker and patron were both sentenced to one year of detention education. The establishment's owner had been put in administrative detention for 15 days before being transferred to a criminal detention facility on July 6 on charges of "sheltering prostitution". The parlor's hostess, who fled the scene, has been put on a law enforcement wanted list.

The notice revealed the offenders' personal information, including their names and ages.

Many community residents, who had long been concerned about the their neighborhood's increasingly negative reputation, applauded the move.

"Shame on the prostitution!" Changjiang Commercial Daily quoted a local resident surnamed Liu as saying.

"Their names should be publicized, and people should loathe and despise them."

However, most believe publicizing the offenders' real names is a violation of their privacy.

The news story became one of the most commented upon online. A survey on sina.com, the country's largest news portal, found 60.3 percent of the 101,758 netizens polled by 6 pm on Sunday believed that publicly revealing offenders' real names is a violation of privacy.

Only 36.2 percent of those surveyed supported the move, saying it will help deter illegal activities, such as prostitution.

Changjiang Commercial Daily quoted a lawyer surnamed Gu as saying the police acted in accordance with law.

"Because the offense was proven, there was no invasion of privacy," Gu said.

But another lawyer, Zhang Wanying, believed the move was inappropriate.

"Even criminals have the right to privacy," Zhang said.

Henan Provincial Party School professor Zhang Tingyin told China Daily the issue should be viewed from two perspectives - that of the individual and that of society.

"On the level of the individual, the offenders' privacy has been violated and it may have negative impacts on their future lives," he explained.

"On the level of society, labeling them as criminals involved in prostitution subjects them to social discrimination."

In a similar case, the publication of two sex workers' and two patrons' photographs by media in Dongguan, Guangdong province, aroused online controversy over the weekend.

A radio and television station in Dongguan's Qingxi township included three photographs of offenders in a report on a July 5 raid. When the photographs were posted online, a thread at Mop.com questioning their release sparked heated controversy, with most Web users opposed to publicizing the photos.

China Daily

(China Daily 07/19/2010 page4)

 
Video
Specials



 
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 上思县| 天水市| 萨迦县| 潮州市| 阆中市| 苍溪县| 突泉县| 年辖:市辖区| 岗巴县| 宿松县| 平凉市| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 天等县| 岚皋县| 固原市| 满洲里市| 伊宁县| 萨嘎县| 新密市| 镇安县| 郯城县| 石楼县| 博罗县| 文成县| 五峰| 宁夏| 翁牛特旗| 罗甸县| 肇源县| 博爱县| 绵阳市| 涿州市| 安国市| 西城区| 凤庆县| 冕宁县| 平乡县| 兴文县| 深圳市| 卢龙县| 丰原市| 巴东县| 宁河县| 和硕县| 迁安市| 孝感市| 体育| 东港市| 静宁县| 凤冈县| 汝州市| 全椒县| 游戏| 当雄县| 马关县| 陆良县| 尉氏县| 读书| 济源市| 固原市| 蓬安县| 五原县| 武冈市| 普宁市| 资溪县| 柘荣县| 舟曲县| 张家界市| 屯留县| 内丘县| 万全县| 陈巴尔虎旗| 如皋市| 台中市| 凤翔县| 静安区| 广汉市| 衡山县| 徐闻县| 丹阳市| 七台河市| 文水县|