男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Britain's Janus-faced China policy

By Guo Yage | Xinhua | Updated: 2021-02-24 07:27
Share
Share - WeChat

 

A woman wearing a protective face mask is seen near Tower Bridge, after new nationwide restrictions were announced during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in London, Britain, Nov 3, 2020. [Photo/Agencies]

London's China policy has gone extremely Janus-faced, if not deranged.

Addressing the UN Human Rights Council on Monday, British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab maliciously smeared the human rights record in Xinjiang. He even attempted to lobby other council members and the United Nations to join his rumor-mongering campaign.

However, just a few days ago, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson reportedly branded himself as "fervently Sinophile" and vowed to improve ties with China.

Over the past two years, Downing Street's China policy has grown increasingly inconsistent. Sometimes, it looks like a person's two hands are working against each other.

While one hand was giving the order to promote bilateral cooperation with China, notably in trade and economy, the other one issued instructions to ban Huawei in Britain's 5G rollout, blocked China's law-abiding television network, adopted tailored policy for Hong Kong residents, and barred the import of goods from Xinjiang citing the so-called use of "forced labor."

Carrying out such a two-faced policy is like splashing dirty water onto someone repeatedly and then saying, "Never mind and let's be friends."

London also seems to be self-deceiving. It appears that some British policymakers are pretending their anti-China talking will not be heard by China.

The only logical explanation for such duplicity is that London intends to eat the cake and have it. It wants to cash in on its pragmatic cooperation with China while pretending that it can stand tough against what the "Western democracies" call the "Red China."

The British decision-makers need to know that such a Janus-faced strategy will only lead to double failure on both fronts.

In the post-pandemic and post-Brexit era, a healthy and stable relationship with China is in line with Britain's own long-term interests. And that relationship is only possible when London knows how to foster mutual trust and respect with Beijing.

Of course, it is London's liberty to choose to advocate the so-called Western values. Yet if it seeks to do it at the expense of China's core interests, Beijing will not sit quietly.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 保靖县| 灵丘县| 安徽省| 宁晋县| 扎赉特旗| 乐安县| 全州县| 枣阳市| 丰宁| 临沧市| 百色市| 大宁县| 甘泉县| 安图县| 宁陵县| 阿拉善盟| 泰州市| 德化县| 犍为县| 蓬溪县| 清远市| 达日县| 汶川县| 武冈市| 崇文区| 赤壁市| 拜泉县| 大埔县| 南华县| 新密市| 灵丘县| 铁岭市| 大石桥市| 新和县| 甘孜| 卢氏县| 京山县| 镇坪县| 炉霍县| 县级市| 小金县| 龙岩市| 台南市| 微山县| 尖扎县| 通山县| 靖西县| 镇安县| 横山县| 建水县| 美姑县| 镇坪县| 玉溪市| 娱乐| 资兴市| 灯塔市| 合作市| 霍邱县| 阳泉市| 南郑县| 绥宁县| 吴桥县| 商南县| 杂多县| 江西省| 浦江县| 确山县| 威海市| 合肥市| 梅河口市| 靖边县| 深水埗区| 洪江市| 温州市| 革吉县| 桐柏县| 库尔勒市| 宜良县| 嵩明县| 靖西县| 那曲县| 家居|