男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
China / View

Legal protection for riders and providers

(China Daily) Updated: 2017-03-22 07:24

IN WHAT IS BELIEVED TO BE the country's first court case against a company offering a shared-bicycle service, a 31-year-old Beijing citizen is suing Ofo, one of the country's leading bike-sharing companies, as he claims that he was injured due to a faulty bike he rented two months ago, Guangzhou Daily commented on Tuesday:

The plaintiff claims that Ofo is responsible for insufficient maintenance, as he alleges the brakes on the bike he hired were faulty. He is claiming 20,000 yuan ($2,900) as compensation to cover his medical treatment, mental distress and transportation costs.

He is not the first rider to solicit compensation from bike-sharing operators in the country on the grounds that the bikes they used were not well maintained.

Albeit most claimants' requests were answered and properly dealt with by the companies concerned, a routine approach to situations like this is still missing. Accidents involving sharing bikes, which have become very popular in less than a year, will inevitably increase as more people use them. That warrants a tailored accountability mechanism when it comes to the respective responsibilities of both users and the bike-sharing service providers.

The business model of station-less bikes is designed to help urban commuters travel the "last mile" more efficiently. To protect users' legal interests, ensuring their bikes are in satisfactory condition is the least the bike providers can do.

Admittedly, big players such as Mobike and Ofo are covered by insurance and they pledge to compensate riders for any injuries incurred while using the bikes. Compensation is also available for people injured by those using the bikes.

Such efforts are praiseworthy, but not enough. They should be institutionalized and streamlined in the way insurance is compulsory for all vehicles.

Bike-sharing service providers, too, need legal protection because they are at risk of being blackmailed by unscrupulous users willing to go to great lengths to be compensated.

(China Daily 03/22/2017 page8)

Highlights
Hot Topics

...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 奈曼旗| 白银市| 德江县| 郓城县| 永顺县| 随州市| 桦甸市| 阿合奇县| 海晏县| 米林县| 大悟县| 土默特左旗| 滕州市| 望谟县| 志丹县| 岢岚县| 灵丘县| 山西省| 岗巴县| 朔州市| 茂名市| 拉萨市| 常州市| 中阳县| 莒南县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 麦盖提县| 邓州市| 阿克陶县| 长沙市| 武功县| 伽师县| 靖州| 兴隆县| 石阡县| 安福县| 五寨县| 宁南县| 博爱县| 吉隆县| 绵竹市| 万荣县| 德清县| 墨脱县| 民丰县| 庐江县| 海伦市| 成武县| 长治市| 杭锦后旗| 渝中区| 庆阳市| 昌图县| 陈巴尔虎旗| 留坝县| 大洼县| 喜德县| 千阳县| 温州市| 武隆县| 红桥区| 宁安市| 崇义县| 甘洛县| 滕州市| 饶平县| 获嘉县| 翁牛特旗| 八宿县| 皮山县| 肇源县| 唐山市| 当阳市| 新平| 苍山县| 本溪市| 鄂伦春自治旗| 宝清县| 峨山| 普格县| 绵竹市| 休宁县|