男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
OPINION> Commentary
Let market forces prevail
(China Daily)
Updated: 2008-12-22 07:44

The policy support that the central government gives is meant to create a favorable climate for the sluggish property market to bottom out. Local governments can surely do their bit to help bring such policy incentives into full play. But what they should never try to do is replace market forces with administrative measures to stop the cyclical correction of housing prices.

In the latest attempt to buoy the declining domestic property market, the State Council announced last week that it will waive business tax on real estate sales and relax mortgage policies for second-home buyers.

As a key sector that contributes to a quarter of China's fixed-asset investment and employs 77 million people, the downward adjustment of the property market certainly justifies government support, especially when the national economy has been hit increasingly hard by the global financial crisis and economic recession.

Latest statistics show that the floor space of residential properties sold in the first 11 months fell 18.8 percent from a year earlier, while real estate investment growth slowed to 22.7 percent in the January-November period, down from 24.6 percent in the first 10 months.

By gradually removing restrictive measures, adopted to rein in the unchecked surge in housing prices in recent years, the central government made clear its resolve to revive the property market. But the latest policy relaxation aims to not only revamp a key growth engine for the economy but, more important, to substantially increase supply of affordable housing for the poor.

For local governments, which usually depend heavily on revenues from the real estate sector, the central government's new stimulus package is certainly more than welcome.

Nevertheless, that does not mean local governments can hence step in to prevent property developers from cutting prices to boost sales.

It was reported that local authorities in Nanjing had decided to fine two developers for "cutting prices below cost".

Such direct government intervention in house prices appears anachronistic.

There were indeed many public calls for government intervention in the past several years when housing prices went through the roof in many Chinese cities. But as house prices fall now, some local officials venture to stand in the way of a cyclical correction that seems to have just begun.

Worse, such efforts to control house prices will go largely in vain. They can only protract the adjustment that should be fundamentally driven by market forces.

Local governments should focus on fulfilling their promises of more low-rent and affordable housing for the poor. As for the commercial property market, they can just leave it to suppliers and buyers. A drastic correction must be painful. But it is good for a fast recovery.

(China Daily 12/22/2008 page4)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 个旧市| 汕头市| 宝丰县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 丰镇市| 韶山市| 靖西县| 崇信县| 舟山市| 黑山县| 镇康县| 龙江县| 神池县| 葵青区| 垦利县| 资阳市| 天祝| 呼玛县| 旌德县| 辉南县| 台安县| 齐齐哈尔市| 昌都县| 湘乡市| 汾阳市| 大姚县| 平潭县| 江门市| 吐鲁番市| 峨眉山市| 兴山县| 永昌县| 威宁| 石嘴山市| 蒲城县| 田东县| 同心县| 驻马店市| 兴业县| 盐源县| 临海市| 文化| 木兰县| 武隆县| 静乐县| 开鲁县| 汝城县| 巫山县| 美姑县| 大石桥市| 双江| 大竹县| 镇安县| 桦南县| 新沂市| 黄骅市| 尚志市| 尼玛县| 宜城市| 青河县| 全椒县| 德昌县| 万山特区| 阿瓦提县| 福鼎市| 霍邱县| 乾安县| 林口县| 如皋市| 嘉义市| 中阳县| 丰都县| 鹿邑县| 肥乡县| 蕉岭县| 北川| 汕尾市| 安平县| 涟源市| 龙里县| 安多县| 井研县|