男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
OPINION> Commentary
Family planning blues
(China Daily)
Updated: 2009-01-14 07:35

In a just society, all are equal before the law. Things can go very wrong if some people assume they can violate the law because they are rich. Government policies may not work if the rich think some of these need not apply to them.

China's family planning policy has huge demographic and economic underpinnings. Yet, the rich are known to violate it. In so doing, they actually sabotage not only the economy, but also the rule of law. The question that has long bothered policymakers is how to stop the rich from getting away with violation of the family planning policy.

The Beijing government now plans to make the rich pay more dearly for having more children than the law permits. It is a move that was long overdue. The current practice requiring them to pay on the basis of the city's average per capita annual income is neither fair nor effective enough.

The capital's population must be kept within 18 million by 2020 for the city to be properly developed. But the target could be difficult to meet if the policy is not strictly observed. It is estimated more than 400 million births in China have been prevented since the policy was enacted in the 1970s. It has relieved the country of the pressure of resources shortage, contributing to the fast economic growth in the past three decades.

Three decades into practice, the policy is generally accepted as an imperative that helps ensure a sustained social and economic development. Yet a growing number of rich and powerful people are brazenly flouting it. A 2007 survey conducted in major cities by the National Population and Family Planning Commission showed that many of celebrities and rich people have two children, with 10 percent of them having three.

This phenomenon evokes an increasing number of complaints from the public. Celebrities and rich people are having more children than ordinary people because the fines are not heavy enough to have teeth. In Beijing's case, the fine is too small to be a deterrent. We do not know the details of the plan which was released yesterday. But the bigger issue is whether only a higher fine is the answer to the problem.

The link between the fine and their own annual income should be a more important factor that would make them think twice before deciding to break the law. It is also fairer because the wealthy people should shoulder more responsibility by contributing more to the fund, which is used to provide the public goods their extra children are to consume.

The capital's new rule, despite being inadequate, is a good move. But how to effectively implement it is another challenge. Many rich people either ignore the penalty or are slow to provide the money. In one case in Hubei province, one violator only paid $14,000 of his fine of $106,000.

The suggestion by a commission official to have the names of the offending rich people recorded and depriving them of the opportunity to compete in titles such as "honorary citizen" is a practical choice, for a majority of them do not wish to see their reputation tarnished.

The rich have to realize the importance of the issue and change their attitude. Ultimately, though, the authorities will have to think of ways to ensure that the policy works uniformly for the whole society. Not monetary penalties, but respect for the law must be the real answer.

(China Daily 01/14/2009 page8)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 铅山县| 尚志市| 博野县| 盐津县| 诸暨市| 阳谷县| 双流县| 姜堰市| 东港市| 武川县| 灵台县| 大冶市| 昌黎县| 建德市| 榆林市| 奎屯市| 子洲县| 南和县| 东方市| 高碑店市| 扎兰屯市| 克东县| 吉木乃县| 通道| 潮安县| 海安县| 晴隆县| 泸溪县| 梅州市| 富民县| 武夷山市| 临颍县| 顺义区| 靖安县| 淮南市| 元江| 洪泽县| 扬州市| 沙河市| 磐安县| 高清| 策勒县| 江门市| 犍为县| 安西县| 建水县| 汉源县| 淮滨县| 兴宁市| 武义县| 社会| 永新县| 吉隆县| 延寿县| 临高县| 铜山县| 城口县| 乌兰察布市| 徐汇区| 金湖县| 黎城县| 类乌齐县| 神农架林区| 苍溪县| 凉城县| 怀集县| 琼中| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 萍乡市| 灵山县| 溆浦县| 南投县| 揭西县| 崇州市| 宜君县| 阳泉市| 邮箱| 蒙山县| 襄樊市| 积石山| 余庆县| 阳春市|