男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

OP Rana

Grabbing the tiger problem by the tail

By Op Rana (China Daily)
Updated: 2010-01-25 06:56
Large Medium Small

It is considered the king of the jungle in cultures across Asia. It is the world's favorite animal. It beat the dog, narrowly though, in an Animal Planet poll. But if proper conservation efforts are not taken immediately it will become extinct in China's wild (and the rest of the world, that is, Asia) in a matter of just three decades.

This is definitely not good news less than a month before the Year of the Tiger.

We have already lost three subspecies: Bali, Javan and Caspian (though many experts consider the latter and Siberian tigers to be the same subspecies). And if some experts are to be believed, the South China tiger is already extinct in the wild. After all, it has not been seen in the wild in the past 25 years.

Much has been written about the tiger and how and why we should save it from extinction. "The tiger is the top predator in the food chain. If you protect the tiger, you protect all the other species in the system" Zhu Chunquan, WWF China Program Office's conservation director of biodiversity, said last week. We know it is an umbrella species because it controls the herbivore population and preserves the balance of grasslands and forests. The question is: Is the world eager to protect the grasslands, forests, and the environment as a whole?

If the rich world really wanted to protect the environment, instead of just paying lip service, a constructive agreement would have come out of the Copenhagen climate change conference. The fact is environmental protection is not a game of profit. There's no money (at least immediately) to be made by protecting anything but production of goods and services. On the contrary, the businesspeople stand to lose a lot if they (even superficially) try to protect the environment.

We have theories to readily counter environmentalists' arguments that mankind is facing its worst crisis. There are so-called experts who claim that the only way to fight climate change is to let technology prosper and help produce more goods. The more technology prospers, the more ways we will have to deal with climate change. Quite convincing. There are demographic experts who claim that the world's booming population is good for the market, because it will supply new and more skilled workforce. No arguments.

But what will be the immediate and long-term impact of this production and reproduction boom on the Earth's resources? Our levels of production and communications are already advanced enough to feed, provide shelter and educate the entire population of the world. Yet more than 1 billion people across vast swathes of Africa and Asia and even Central and Latin America are victims of hunger. That's almost one-fifth of humanity.

The road of economic development the rich countries have chosen and the developing ones are following will sooner than later turn this planet into a desert inhabited only by human beings. The world has learned to cool our homes in summer and warm them in winter. It has learned to clone animals and, will sooner than later, reproduce them for meat. It is already using genetically modified (GM) seeds to grow more and more food in increasingly smaller plots of land. It can seed clouds to make rain. In short, it has learned to play around with nature, and is proud of it.

It is a different matter that scientists and experts do not know what harms GM seeds and cloned animals could cause to the human species. The fact is it will be too late to save mankind by the time they know that. Till then, of course, it can be business as usual.

All this makes the tiger a non-entity. What importance does a poor beast have in the market where only money speaks? Maybe we should stop calling it the king of the jungle. And that could soon become a reality, because there will neither be a jungle nor its king.

Xie Yan, director of Wildlife Conservation Society, China Program, was right when she said: "We should let nature take its course." Only that since the Industrial Revolution the pursuit of profit has made nature take its course.

E-mail: oprana@hotmail.com

(China Daily 01/25/2010 page9)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 灵璧县| 高台县| 鄂托克前旗| 宁化县| 遂溪县| 奉新县| 马龙县| 宜丰县| 彭州市| 梅河口市| 古浪县| 柳州市| 莱芜市| 鄂托克旗| 香格里拉县| 三门峡市| 阿拉尔市| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 娄底市| 大姚县| 班玛县| 宁陕县| 宜州市| 梅州市| 公主岭市| 天水市| 江源县| 富民县| 缙云县| 望城县| 贵定县| 莆田市| 龙陵县| 原阳县| 桓台县| 海林市| 武安市| 黄骅市| 达日县| 利川市| 盱眙县| 陆川县| 资溪县| 历史| 雅安市| 乌兰浩特市| 江永县| 东城区| 杭州市| 阳谷县| 红安县| 清新县| 永兴县| 天长市| 西贡区| 河津市| 育儿| 修武县| 方正县| 嘉义市| 大丰市| 道孚县| 阿勒泰市| 杨浦区| 凭祥市| 晋州市| 密云县| 台南县| 灵山县| 乐陵市| 商都县| 清原| 巩义市| 瑞昌市| 金塔县| 阿拉善右旗| 梨树县| 旺苍县| 浪卡子县| 花莲市| 万山特区| 奈曼旗|