男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

Op-Ed Contributors

Big is not enough for overseas deals

By Andre Loesekrug-Pietri (China Daily)
Updated: 2011-04-07 08:00
Large Medium Small

Overseas acquisitions by Chinese companies will be a major trend in the coming years. This is confirmed by the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-2015) and declarations made by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce. But it is loaded with challenges.

First, the United States Committee on Foreign Investments halted Huawei's deal for 3-Leaf. Now, Bright Food has fallen out of the race for Yoplait despite having offered the best price. Some observers may call it protectionism, aimed at excluding Chinese companies from investing in the best assets. The answer, however, is not that simple.

After all, many deals have been successful. According to Ministry of Commerce figures, China's overseas direct investment was $59 billion in 2010, and it is expected to double by 2015. So why did some deals fail and Geely and Fosun succeeded?

Related readings:
Big is not enough for overseas deals Chinese M&A to focus on domestic consolidation

In one of the most competitive bidding processes for a European company (Yoplait), US conglomerate General Mills won the fight against Bright Food, Lactalis and Nestle, to name just a few contenders bidding for the world's second largest yogurt producer. French private equity company PAI, 50 percent co-owner of Yoplait, wanted to sell its stake but shared the choice of buyer with Yoplait's co-owner, Sodiaal, a major farmers' cooperative.

Bright Food emerged as a serious bidder, with its representatives having spent weeks in France meeting all Yopliat stakeholders. They reportedly offered the highest price, sparkling prospects in the Chinese market, guaranteed jobs in France and promised to maximize value for Sodiaal. Yet they couldn't win the French farmers' hearts.

Instead, the deal is going to Yoplait's long-time US distributor General Mills. This has happened despite the recent souring of relations between them over the terms of their franchising contract. Did cultural differences play a role here? Aren't French farmers interested in maximizing their profit? Or did other reasons prevent the Chinese bid from going through?

Chinese firms could learn from these experiences. Multiple reasons, in our view, explain why many deals don't succeed. First, Chinese companies are still unknown to a huge majority of people in Europe and the US. Being unknown doesn't create the level of trust needed to engage local governments, unions, managements and the public as a whole. All these stakeholders become the key factor, especially when famous assets are up for sale.

   Previous Page 1 2 Next Page  

分享按鈕
主站蜘蛛池模板: 紫阳县| 济宁市| 乌拉特后旗| 苏州市| 吉木乃县| 江西省| 淅川县| 天门市| 永泰县| 鄂尔多斯市| 怀集县| 湘潭市| 肇东市| 哈巴河县| 昌黎县| 峡江县| 汝州市| 普安县| 平乡县| 靖江市| 乌海市| 彩票| 岳阳县| 民丰县| 营山县| 定陶县| 乐亭县| 河曲县| 呼和浩特市| 庆云县| 昭通市| 汉中市| 阿拉善盟| 石楼县| 玉树县| 长顺县| 辰溪县| 印江| 谷城县| 于都县| 色达县| 繁峙县| 长葛市| 瓮安县| 镶黄旗| 公主岭市| 石台县| 桂阳县| 湘潭市| 隆回县| 万年县| 丽江市| 呼玛县| 建始县| 西藏| 黄冈市| 潞城市| 沙河市| 齐齐哈尔市| 南城县| 西昌市| 周至县| 丰顺县| 义马市| 南昌县| 湛江市| 三台县| 宁夏| 柳江县| 泾川县| 咸宁市| 保定市| 开原市| 巍山| 拜城县| 涿鹿县| 太康县| 武平县| 聊城市| 永寿县| 永德县| 沾化县|