男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

College management

Updated: 2012-01-13 08:08

(China Daily)

  Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

That most universities and colleges are run in a similar way to government departments has been highlighted as the root cause of their lack of innovation and inability to cultivate first-class scientists and academic researchers.

Unfortunately, the debureaucratization of our institutions of higher learning is unlikely to make much headway, despite the temporary rules for the making of college constitutions and the rules about faculty congresses that came into effect on Jan 1.

Even though the Ministry of Education insists that the constitution of a university or college must reflect the will of the entire institution, not just the will of its president or other leaders, and that it must provide a president with enough autonomy to run the university, the intrinsic inertia of the leadership in most of our universities and colleges makes it almost impossible to change the present governing mechanism.

In most of our institutions of higher learning, leaders at various levels, rather than professors, have the absolute say over all the major decisions. Often it is an administrative official who has the most say over the running of the university or college. As a result, the pursuit of knowledge has been replaced by the pursuit of instant acclaim and money, which finds expression in the increasing number of professors that have been involved in plagiarism scandals in recent years.

True, a university constitution must clarify principles for academic organizations, such as the way academic committees and academic degree assessment committees are organized and run so they can play their role in promoting academic research. But, if the current university and college managements retain their absolute say over major decisions, it will be impossible for constitutions to be worked out that make a big difference to way that universities and colleges are run.

Likewise though the new rules require a university faculty congress composed of no less than 60 percent of teachers that must convene at least once every academic year, it will be difficult for a faculty congress to play its due role if it does not have the mandate to veto university decisions.

Academia must be independent, and unless outstanding academic researchers and professors get the respect and reward that they deserve for their academic contributions, there is little hope our institutions of higher learning will yield outstanding research results and cultivate first-class scientists and academic researchers.

Hopefully the new rules will prompt professors and researchers to maneuver for the independence they need and for a mechanism that supports academic progress.

(China Daily 01/13/2012 page8)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 霍邱县| 天祝| 东宁县| 辉县市| 穆棱市| 静乐县| 西平县| 巩义市| 泾阳县| 安远县| 吴旗县| 平顺县| 通山县| 安新县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 阿荣旗| 长汀县| 宝丰县| 屯昌县| 平阴县| 白玉县| 宁乡县| 青浦区| 习水县| 密山市| 黎平县| 中阳县| 石渠县| 绥德县| 连南| 沐川县| 峨山| 洪雅县| 通州区| 遵义县| 平江县| 诏安县| 洛阳市| 伊通| 沈丘县| 兖州市| 项城市| 射洪县| 东阿县| 辉县市| 乌海市| 沂水县| 丽江市| 长宁县| 海南省| 桐梓县| 望谟县| 台东市| 龙游县| 吉木乃县| 酒泉市| 民县| 靖远县| 伊川县| 长顺县| 赞皇县| 会理县| 深水埗区| 安陆市| 张家界市| 邢台县| 兴海县| 栾城县| 蒲城县| 林芝县| 罗山县| 凤城市| 昆山市| 聂荣县| 沽源县| 绿春县| 恭城| 龙川县| 民和| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 弥渡县| 聂拉木县|