男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Income inequality plan a test of will to reform

By Mark Williams (China Daily) Updated: 2012-12-13 08:23

The fact that the government acknowledges the need to do something to redress these imbalances reflects its recognition of the fact that widening inequality is not just a major social concern. It is also a threat to China's ability to maintain rapid economic growth. Widening inequality has gone hand-in-hand with rising saving because the major beneficiaries of the last few years' growth, company owners and their senior managers, tend to save more than they spend. The latest China Household Finance Survey shows that the top 5 percent of households by income saved 69 percent of their income and accounted for 62 percent of total household savings. The shift to a consumption-led growth model, which is at the heart of the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-15), will happen only if ordinary households have more money to spend.

What might an effective plan to reduce inequality look like? At its core would be efforts to steer more of China's income toward average families.

The most effective steps would focus on boosting competition, job creation and after-tax wages. Protected parts of the economy should be opened up to the private sector. Dominant SOEs should be exposed to more competition from private competitors. The banking system and the wider financial sector should be liberalized so that smaller companies can easily access the capital they need to invest. Subsidies to large companies, in particular the provision of cheap loans, should be withdrawn to level the playing field. And the tax burden should be reduced.

These would be bold steps and not easy to implement. Indeed, they would involve wrenching changes for many protected parts of the economy, which presumably explains why the government has struggled for so long to agree on how to proceed.

But sticking with the status quo is not an option. Widening inequality has welfare costs and will undercut any effort to put the economy on a more sustainable path. In contrast, successful reform would have a transformative effect on China's prospects, setting the stage for another decade of strong economic growth.

The author is chief Asia economist at Capital Economics, a London-based independent macroeconomic research consultancy.

(China Daily 12/13/2012 page9)

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 肇东市| 原平市| 于都县| 乾安县| 明星| 雷州市| 嘉荫县| 千阳县| 顺昌县| 亚东县| 鸡西市| 方山县| 阿拉善右旗| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 兴文县| 台江县| 余庆县| 潞城市| 皋兰县| 五莲县| 昌吉市| 宣恩县| 含山县| 大宁县| 广州市| 昭苏县| 桦南县| 高安市| 永川市| 塔河县| 萝北县| 缙云县| 朔州市| 华池县| 金门县| 博爱县| 琼中| 灵山县| 滦平县| 庆阳市| 卓尼县| 盐池县| 瑞安市| 邹平县| 杨浦区| 延吉市| 阿尔山市| 鹤山市| 南丰县| 军事| 华宁县| 京山县| 北辰区| 鄄城县| 荔浦县| 西青区| 黄浦区| 长海县| 江川县| 石景山区| 龙游县| 黄梅县| 洛隆县| 霸州市| 乐东| 军事| 深圳市| 滨州市| 天峻县| 汉源县| 湖口县| 独山县| 大关县| 扶风县| 兴业县| 会同县| 左云县| 丰城市| 闸北区| 方山县| 鸡西市| 类乌齐县|