男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Web Comments

Developing countries must take lead in emissions rules

By Mukul Sanwal (chinadaily.com.cn) Updated: 2012-12-17 21:08

The most significant outcome of Doha was to formally begin the process of negotiating a new climate agreement. The requirement now is to ensure "the highest possible mitigation efforts by all parties" for "aggregate emission pathways consistent with having a likely chance of holding the increase in global average temperature below 2 degrees C or 1.5 degrees C above pre-industrial levels". But given present emissions, 6 degrees C is more likely by the end of the century, as all countries want others to bear the burden, and clearly a very different framework is needed.

The defining feature of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was the allocation of efforts to combat climate change on the basis of per-capita income. Developed countries were listed in an annex to the convention, and the central feature of the ongoing negotiations over 20 years has been the efforts of developed countries to end this differentiation.

In this time, the developing countries' primary focus was on the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities" focused on short-term needs of implementation, like finance, technology and market mechanisms, rather than allocation of effort between the designated groups of countries. For example, even in Durban in 2011, in the context of maintaining the differentiation, the developing countries pushed for an extension of the Kyoto Protocol without identifying emissions targets for developed countries required by science. There is still no common understanding of an "equitable" approach to climate policy, as different countries emphasise "differentiated responsibilities", "common responsibilities" and "respective capabilities", leading to continuing north-south tension.

Climate policy outside the UNFCCC has also been driven by the United States, which viewed the Kyoto Protocol with its emission reduction commitments only for developed countries as a "dichotomous" distinction as incomes and emissions continued to rise in many countries considered to be developing countries, reflecting the general pace of global economic growth.

The United States re-engaged in the climate negotiations by convening the Major Economies Forum, and in July 2009, leaders of 17 developed and developing countries agreed that "peaking of global emissions should take place as soon as possible", with large developing countries recognizing the need to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions over a longer time span than the others. This was formalized in the Copenhagen Accord (2009) and Cancun Agreements (2010), blurring the distinction between countries established on the basis of per-capita incomes. Some distinction remained in the nature of the measures or actions, with developed countries alone required to make economywide reductions, and this was also removed at Durban, in 2011.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 巴彦淖尔市| 广汉市| 噶尔县| 东城区| 承德市| 江华| 新竹县| 禄劝| 资阳市| 左云县| 邹平县| 赤城县| 荣成市| 化州市| 安康市| 大同县| 肥西县| 清河县| 博湖县| 察雅县| 太白县| 阿拉善盟| 琼海市| 河东区| 揭东县| 岢岚县| 越西县| 中西区| 江阴市| 浪卡子县| 渭源县| 墨脱县| 尼木县| 浠水县| 黑水县| 凤阳县| 禄丰县| 安庆市| 乡城县| 寻乌县| 加查县| 宁河县| 同江市| 德安县| 县级市| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 安义县| 昌乐县| 上饶县| 泗阳县| 碌曲县| 南宁市| 荔波县| 康定县| 永善县| 晋中市| 梅州市| 兴隆县| 赫章县| 江山市| 山东| 乌拉特后旗| 东莞市| 云梦县| 西和县| 巴南区| 丹凤县| 黄石市| 防城港市| 诸暨市| 文昌市| 乐东| 确山县| 泰来县| 锦屏县| 平武县| 阳信县| 海南省| 怀宁县| 福州市| 法库县| 富民县|