男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Human rights progress as a matter of fact

By Shen Tong | China Daily | Updated: 2013-02-16 08:12

Aside from clauses forbidding judges to accept gifts or services from interested parties or their attorneys, the amendment also highlights a new arrangement to allow small claims for debts or damages to be handled more efficiently. All these stipulations are aimed at creating a litigation system that can better protect human rights.

In 2012, China launched court and procuratorate reforms in the railways, too, which is a relatively independent domain. Other sweeping judicial reforms have also been launched, including measures to improve the commutation and parole system, strengthen the work of judicial suggestion and set up a judge's oath system, all of which will help make the country's judicial system more open. In the prosecution domain, the reforms launched are aimed at improving the open review procedure of criminal cases and the archives query mechanism on bribery, and optimizing the risks prevention system for clean governance.

Reforms in the field of justice administration were also launched in 2012, and they ranged from promulgation of regulations on administrative detention and setting up of criminal records to measures to improve the community-based correction system and reform the controversial labor education system.

China published a white paper on its judicial reform in October 2012, reviewing its judicial system and reform process and expounding efforts to maintain social fairness and justice and protect human rights. On protecting human rights, the white paper generalizes the effective measures China's judicial bodies have been taking to deter and prohibit extraction of confessions through torture, better protect the rights of criminal suspects and defendants, and protect attorneys' right to exercise their duties.

Apart from stating China's approach of controlling and prudently applying the death penalty, the white paper also stipulates that measures should be taken to improve the State compensation system and set up a mechanism to offer assistance to victims of crimes.

No country can claim to have the best human rights conditions. And just like other countries, China too has to improve its judicial system. But foreign organizations and think tanks should not ignore the remarkable progress China has already made in judicial reforms and human rights protection.

The deliberate distortion of China's human rights record by Human Rights Watch to give the country a bad name will ultimately boomerang on the New York-based organization.

The author is a researcher at the School of Laws in Tianjin-based Nankai University.

(China Daily 02/16/2013 page5)

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 疏勒县| 商河县| 康保县| 葵青区| 涡阳县| 苏尼特右旗| 麟游县| 漳平市| 民乐县| 潜江市| 蒙山县| 宜君县| 夏河县| 汝州市| 济南市| 象山县| 西藏| 安达市| 长岛县| 牟定县| 随州市| 城口县| 桃园市| 濉溪县| 永胜县| 高阳县| 福泉市| 陇川县| 沙雅县| 铜川市| 安化县| 巩义市| 崇仁县| 津南区| 基隆市| 合作市| 临安市| 邢台县| 天全县| 汪清县| 岳阳市| 宜君县| 咸阳市| 定兴县| 调兵山市| 淳安县| 宁安市| 榆树市| 邵东县| 武陟县| 乌拉特前旗| 沁阳市| 珠海市| 云阳县| 延吉市| 惠州市| 故城县| 兴国县| 旺苍县| 襄垣县| 醴陵市| 九龙县| 东丽区| 靖西县| 伊宁市| 渝中区| 长沙市| 潜江市| 密云县| 尼木县| 大竹县| 梁平县| 平泉县| 利辛县| 新营市| 于都县| 柳州市| 长治县| 昭通市| 前郭尔| 阿拉善盟| 花垣县|