男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Transatlantic trends of trade

By David Fouquet and Jiang Shixue | China Daily | Updated: 2013-02-23 07:59

Potential EU-US free trade area would have big repercussions for China and other partners in Asia and South America

Plans recently announced for the creation of a vast new Atlantic free trade area, if realized, would have historic economic and trade implications, but potentially also geopolitical and strategic repercussions.

Although at first glance the ambitious and long-discussed project, representing trillions of dollars in trade and investment, directly concerns only the European Union and United States, it is clearly directed at China and other rising Asian economies.

President Barack Obama and various EU leaders have focused attention on the more concrete, tangible trade and economic benefits that might accrue from the establishment of a vast free trade area between the US and EU: The two account for close to half the total world GDP and one-third of world trade - some half a trillion euros a year in goods and more than 250 billion euros ($330 billion) in services - and have more than 2 trillion euros in accumulated direct investment on each side of the Atlantic.

Yet, while they emphasized that such an accord could be expected to generate an extra 0.05 percent GDP growth in the EU - a positive spin coinciding with data showing continuing contraction in EU output - some of the leaders pointed to other less tangible objectives.

Not only was the economic rise and influence of China cited by both officials and media on both sides of the Atlantic as a primary stimulus for the proposed trade zone, it was also characterized as an "Economic NATO" or a US "rebalancing" toward Europe after the much publicized previous US pivot to Asia.

Officials in both Washington and Brussels were reported to have said that the rising economic might of China gave added incentive to the undertaking. They said that the trade agreement would provide a more united front against Chinese standards and norms on areas such as product safety or intellectual property. EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht was quoted as saying that without such an agreement, "we would be forced to accept Chinese standards".

But the fact remains that if the Atlantic partners show unity and solidarity in some areas, they are also of profoundly different economic and social cultures in some aspects, including regulation of business, consumer or environmental protection, antitrust or competition policy and many others. This difference is especially profound in southern Europe where agricultural interests are seen as being threatened by greater opening to globalized trade and competition. For decades, Europeans have resisted US practices involving genetically modified crops, the antibiotic treatment of animals and fisheries, or the imports of certain US agricultural products.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 九台市| 读书| 太康县| 吉林省| 建瓯市| 濮阳市| 和静县| 承德市| 大新县| 左贡县| 恩施市| 信丰县| 澄城县| 仪征市| 衡山县| 安龙县| 辽宁省| 菏泽市| 平武县| 诸城市| 和平县| 盐城市| 嘉义县| 秦皇岛市| 宁陵县| 栖霞市| 绥德县| 团风县| 通海县| 绥中县| 嘉义县| 彰化市| 榆树市| 军事| 弥勒县| 阳西县| 新密市| 和静县| 双辽市| 辽中县| 黄骅市| 新郑市| 荔浦县| 开封县| 平远县| 西盟| 苏州市| 上蔡县| 德化县| 瑞安市| 章丘市| 三门县| 卫辉市| 井陉县| 文昌市| 贡山| 南阳市| 晋城| 全椒县| 且末县| 呼玛县| 长阳| 东城区| 安乡县| 金昌市| 福鼎市| 那曲县| 黄骅市| 隆子县| 高阳县| 正蓝旗| 清徐县| 崇文区| 白朗县| 淮北市| 徐水县| 綦江县| 洛宁县| 和平区| 虎林市| 德令哈市| 依兰县|