男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Counties may be incorrectly labeled as poverty stricken

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2013-02-27 20:18

Datong county’s return to the ranks of poverty county after 16 years, shows that related authorities haven’t followed the criteria and standard by which poverty counties should be judged, says an article on China Youth Daily. Excerpts:

In 1996, Datong county in Shanxi province was judged to be a comparatively well-off county. But Datong’s financial income in that year was only 37.4 million yuan ($600 million), while expenditure was as high as 65.9 million yuan. Datong local authority couldn’t make ends meet at that time and didn’t achieve the 16 principles that determine a comparatively well-off county.

It’s was simply the hopes and endeavors of local authorities’ that led to Datong being judged to be a comparatively well-off county.

In January this year, Datong was labeled a national poverty county — again thanks to the efforts of local officials.

It makes the public doubt whether counties labeled as being comparatively well-off or poverty stricken, or the metropolises labeled as clean or livable cities, really deserve their name.

If a county is really poor and needs help it should be regarded as a poverty county once local authorities report the real situation. But according to Wang Hanbin, chief of Datong poverty alleviation and development office, it’s difficult to get the document that will classify Datong as a national poverty county. There are many human factors that influence if a county is poor. A widespread joke goes: A head of a county said his area isn’t regarded as a poverty county because they are too poor.

The label of comparatively well-off or poverty can be unduly influenced by the individuals in the counties who want a certain label because it could benefit them. Liang Shubin, former headmaster of Datong county party school, said it’s difficult for them to get funds or financial aid if they have the label comparatively well-off county.

Datong’s case exposes how authorities do not strictly implement policy determining the areas rankings according to criteria and standards.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 陇西县| 迭部县| 宁阳县| 诏安县| 延津县| 白水县| 芜湖县| 兴山县| 赤水市| 敦化市| 红河县| 乡城县| 离岛区| 横峰县| 城步| 宜昌市| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 淮北市| 商都县| 鄄城县| 自治县| 江阴市| 北票市| 迭部县| 拜城县| 论坛| 万州区| 西藏| 肇庆市| 新宾| 南木林县| 铜梁县| 长宁区| 加查县| 呼伦贝尔市| 读书| 江山市| 全州县| 永修县| 略阳县| 丰顺县| 常熟市| 福建省| 汪清县| 杭锦后旗| 四平市| 新建县| 康乐县| 鹰潭市| 黄陵县| 阿荣旗| 五大连池市| 大连市| 牡丹江市| 乐都县| 姚安县| 昌黎县| 阿城市| 大丰市| 库车县| 林芝县| 武夷山市| 长汀县| 富蕴县| 浙江省| 温泉县| 沂南县| 察隅县| 梅州市| 图片| 灵山县| 确山县| 大荔县| 将乐县| 当阳市| 郓城县| 方正县| 陵川县| 霸州市| 临朐县| 女性| 济宁市|