男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

No first use of nuclear weapons

By Yao Yunzhu | China Daily | Updated: 2013-04-25 08:13

In addition, former president Hu Jintao reaffirmed the policy of no first use at the nuclear security summit in Seoul in March last year. It has been reiterated in all necessary policy documents and official statements since. There is no sign that China has changed or is going to change a policy it has wisely adopted and persistently upheld for half a century.

However, speculation about a possible change to the policy of no first use has not emerged without reason. Calls for a change to the policy pledge are repeatedly heard in the Chinese media, including social media such as micro blogs, these stem from two basic understandings:

First, in the likelihood of confrontation, the ballistic missile defense systems that the United States and its allies have deployed, or are planning to deploy, would be capable of intercepting retaliatory Chinese nuclear weapons launched after it has already been attacked, thus potentially negating the effectiveness of China's nuclear arsenal as a deterrent.

Second, the US is developing its conventional strategic strike capabilities. Once deployed, they could have the capability to strike China's nuclear arsenal in the case of conflict and make redundant China's policy of no first use.

So far, no nuclear states have made it official policy to strike with strategic conventional capabilities against the nuclear weapons of another state, although such capabilities are being developed for the declared purpose of neutralizing the capabilities of nuclear proliferators. So the Cold War position of only using nuclear weapons against nuclear weapons still seems valid.

However, the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act, which was signed into law by US President Barack Obama on Jan 2, requests a report from the Commander of US Strategic Command by Aug 15 on alleged Chinese underground tunnel networks and to review the US capability to neutralize such networks with "conventional and nuclear forces". It seems to imply that a conventional strike against Chinese nuclear weapon systems is an option.

For nearly half a century, China's pledge of no first use has served as the cornerstone of its policy on nuclear weapons. China and the rest of the world should uphold the policy of no first use, rather than discredit such a commitment.

A constructive approach would be to ensure the policy through nuclear policy dialogues, establishing a multilateral agreement on no first use among all the nuclear weapon states, and to consider limiting or even prohibiting the use of nuclear weapons in a legally binding international agreement.

The author is director of the China-America Defense Relations at the Academy of Military Science. www.chinausfocus.com

(China Daily 04/25/2013 page8)

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 克什克腾旗| 昭平县| 泸西县| 墨玉县| 林口县| 十堰市| 工布江达县| 罗平县| 雅江县| 巴彦县| 玉门市| 龙泉市| 铜梁县| 措勤县| 石河子市| 环江| 库尔勒市| 金坛市| 浮梁县| 无极县| 宾阳县| 许昌市| 疏勒县| 利川市| 青浦区| 永城市| 竹山县| 临邑县| 托克托县| 石棉县| 皮山县| 和田县| 凌云县| 四会市| 彭阳县| 威信县| 简阳市| 北辰区| 黄大仙区| 淮阳县| 紫金县| 武宣县| 隆尧县| 开化县| 田阳县| 于田县| 武强县| 黄浦区| 保德县| 石柱| 布拖县| 威远县| 吉水县| 涿州市| 雅江县| 郸城县| 汉中市| 醴陵市| 密云县| 西平县| 齐河县| 仲巴县| 射洪县| 富民县| 株洲县| 扎赉特旗| 茌平县| 新邵县| 南京市| 五家渠市| 兴业县| 罗甸县| 永安市| 绥江县| 敖汉旗| 确山县| 金平| 天台县| 文成县| 常州市| 五常市| 清河县|