男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Diplomacy is the best policy

By J.M. Norton | China Daily | Updated: 2013-07-10 08:10

In his "Farewell Address" (1796), first US president George Washington advised future American leaders on how to manage foreign affairs. He advocated the development of commercial relations with foreign countries and the curtailment of political bonds. He observed that the US' "detached and distant situation" enables Americans to pursue a different course. He also advocated against "standing on foreign ground" and against "engaging in permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world".

Furthermore, he said, interactions "are recommended through policy, humanity and interest", and future leaders should approach them with all nations within the framework of "harmony, open-minded intercourse".

Generally speaking, American leaders have failed to heed Washington's counsel. Since the end of World War II, they have intensified political bonds with foreign countries, stood on foreign ground, and engaged in permanent bilateral and multilateral alliances. Also, they have conducted the majority of their interactions with foreign countries not within the framework of humanity and interest. Instead, their main instrument and organizing principle of US foreign policy have been military. Often this approach has been combined with a nation-building policy through economic means, which harms the political cultures and social fabrics of countries situated far from America's shores.

Significant changes in the US foreign policy could be traced back to the end of World War II. Although the US emerged from the war as the preponderant power, its leaders reached no such conclusion. Perceiving that the rise of the Soviet Union created a precarious balance of power in the international system, the US leaders believed the threat resulting from this unstable balance significantly endangered US national security.

So the leaders restructured the American domestic intelligence and military systems, and adopted new foreign policy approaches underpinned by the threat of force. The National Security Act of 1947 reordered the intelligence community and military, but most importantly, it created a permanent, professional military and placed foreign policy powers within the executive branch.

Previous 1 2 Next

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 乌鲁木齐市| 新和县| 同仁县| 临朐县| 柘荣县| 工布江达县| 澄江县| 丹江口市| 池州市| 南溪县| 芒康县| 河北区| 武义县| 英山县| 岗巴县| 德钦县| 靖江市| 葫芦岛市| 平原县| 日照市| 齐齐哈尔市| 来宾市| 伊金霍洛旗| 苍南县| 刚察县| 宁陵县| 西平县| 隆昌县| 乐亭县| 平罗县| 吴桥县| 策勒县| 循化| 平湖市| 临安市| 德江县| 二连浩特市| 库车县| 富川| 平武县| 兴宁市| 班玛县| 兴山县| 监利县| 万年县| 共和县| 苍梧县| 神池县| 宜春市| 全南县| 河北省| 五指山市| 大理市| 济阳县| 蒙自县| 曲麻莱县| 阳原县| 兴安盟| 读书| 东台市| 西峡县| 塔河县| 伊金霍洛旗| 自治县| 佛冈县| 博兴县| 莎车县| 建宁县| 仙桃市| 云和县| 泾川县| 香港| 雷山县| 黎城县| 扶绥县| 西林县| 南丹县| 松江区| 肇庆市| 那曲县| 遵化市| 涡阳县|