男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Rethink 'traffic congestion fees'

China Daily | Updated: 2013-09-18 07:49

The Beijing environmental authorities recently issued an action plan to improve the city's air quality and asked relevant departments to discuss the possibility of collecting "traffic congestion fees" to reduce pollution, which has been questioned by many, says an article in Guangming Daily. Excerpts:

The Beijing environmental authorities have adopted a series of measures in recent years to ease traffic congestions but still failed to substantially improve the situation. The traffic congestion problem in Beijing is the result of highly concentrated public resources in the city and severely imbalanced distribution of its functional areas.

Rethink 'traffic congestion fees'

Lines of cars are pictured during a rush hour traffic jam on Guomao Bridge in Beijing. [Photo/Agencies]

The urbanization drive in China has made cities increasingly bigger. On the other hand, employment opportunities, and healthcare and education facilities in the satellite cities and suburban areas are still inadequate, widening the distance between people's homes and workplaces.

Therefore, the need to devise a scientific and workable plan to improve opportunities, and public amenities facilities has become more important than ever to ease the traffic congestion problem in cities.

When it comes to imposing the proposed "traffic congestion fees", the authorities have to decide whether public transport vehicles will also have to pay them and who foots the bill. If taxpayers end up paying the "traffic congestion fees" for public transport vehicles, that would be social injustice. In this sense, the proposal to impose "traffic congestion fees" is part of not only an environmental policy, but also a social policy.

Many people who support the proposed fees will cite the examples of the models followed by countries such as Singapore. But since Beijing is a mega-city with a population of 20 million, it would cost an astronomical amount of money to build a public transportation system as convenient as that of Singapore.

The impact of public policies will be different on different social groups. Hence, the authorities must solicit the opinions of all social groups before implementing a social policy. Only if all social groups are taken into confidence can a social policy prove truly successful upon implementation.

(China Daily 09/18/2013 page9)

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 满城县| 加查县| 高邮市| 涟源市| 霍林郭勒市| 怀化市| 辉南县| 朝阳县| 电白县| 德昌县| 社旗县| 娄烦县| 江永县| 乐东| 义马市| 阿坝| 城固县| 嘉定区| 沂源县| 平顶山市| 泸溪县| 徐州市| 道真| 台东县| 黄龙县| 嘉荫县| 博野县| 桃江县| 杭锦旗| 盐源县| 宣恩县| 安康市| 长阳| 五寨县| 莱阳市| 筠连县| 天门市| 安福县| 淮北市| 石楼县| 雅江县| 邵武市| 秀山| 江津市| 泉州市| 陆良县| 静安区| 海南省| 彰武县| 昌宁县| 肥乡县| 杭锦后旗| 福鼎市| 吉安县| 睢宁县| 乌兰浩特市| 邢台市| 建德市| 靖宇县| 永州市| 枝江市| 云梦县| 区。| 峨眉山市| 临城县| 新兴县| 奇台县| 五台县| 秀山| 福贡县| 都江堰市| 临洮县| 桂阳县| 治县。| 齐河县| 繁峙县| 偃师市| 外汇| 甘德县| 鸡泽县| 临西县| 神木县|