男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Govt must keep public buses safe

By Ma Liang (China Daily) Updated: 2014-07-15 07:43

Also, regular fire drills should be organized to train passengers how to break through emergency exits and get out of a bus that has caught fire, which can greatly reduce the loss of lives.

Compared with the bus fires in Guiyang (6 deaths and 35 injuries in 2014), Xiamen, Fujian province (47 deaths and 34 injuries in 2013) and Chengdu, Sichuan province, (27 deaths and 74 injuries in 2009), the Hangzhou incident was handled much more successfully largely because of the prompt actions taken by the driver and passengers. Witnesses and firefighters, too, played a vital role in minimizing the damage.

The government, however, should order a thorough investigation into the Hangzhou bus fire and use its results to suitably adjust its future rules for public transport safety. For instance, after a bus fire in Texas killed 24 people in 2005, the US National Transportation Safety Board held a public hearing the next year to find out how best it could prevent such incidents.

Over the past two decades, public bus services in many cities have been privatized to reduce losses. But private transport operators, whose sole motive is to make maximum profits, usually ignore bus safety regulations. Due to the volatility of franchise contracts, operators have little incentive to invest in the industry (that is, purchase new buses and install expensive safety mechanisms).

Since public buses are generally overcrowded, it is difficult to evacuate passengers in emergencies such as a fire. The results of privatizing public transport systems, especially bus services, around the world are mixed and inconclusive. So local urban authorities should pay greater attention to public good before privatizing transport systems.

As a country in transition, China faces many challenges and threats, including those from terrorists. Social inequity is believed to be one of the primary sources of social problems. Vulnerable people deprived of social welfare benefits are more liable to desperation, and in their frenzy they could even torch buses. Therefore, the government should take measures to reduce social inequality and ensure that everyone gets to share the benefits of the country's economic development, because that will reduce social risks. Also, a safety net should be built to help disadvantaged social groups and prevent them from taking desperate actions that endanger innocent people's lives.

The author is a research fellow at Nanyang Centre for Public Administration, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 崇礼县| 林州市| 荥阳市| 温宿县| 昂仁县| 那曲县| 莱阳市| 永州市| 安陆市| 武定县| 天镇县| 松桃| 赤水市| 澄城县| 衢州市| 原平市| 云安县| 高密市| 崇州市| 莱西市| 米脂县| 富蕴县| 铜陵市| 得荣县| 正蓝旗| 新平| 镇赉县| 新兴县| 米泉市| 葵青区| 丰城市| 肃北| 百色市| 化德县| 资中县| 琼中| 治县。| 洛阳市| 永州市| 蕲春县| 荆州市| 娱乐| 三亚市| 清河县| 邛崃市| 昔阳县| 德清县| 抚顺市| 霞浦县| 奇台县| 商丘市| 罗平县| 湄潭县| 巴马| 吐鲁番市| 沂南县| 苏州市| 革吉县| 灵宝市| 开化县| 汉中市| 龙泉市| 灵川县| 上犹县| 礼泉县| 永年县| 宜阳县| 宜都市| 犍为县| 罗平县| 汽车| 庆城县| 新干县| 红桥区| 尚义县| 潮州市| 淮滨县| 逊克县| 武鸣县| 青浦区| 绥芬河市| 中牟县|