男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Fare hike a billion yuan question

By Zhang Haitao (China Daily) Updated: 2014-07-21 07:36

Fare hike a billion yuan question

Throughout the world, transport fares are the concern of not only transport operators, but also commuters. A fare policy determines the amount of subsidies a public transport agency needs to cover its operation costs. It also determines which modes of transport people use and how many cars are on the streets.

This means a new fare policy in Beijing could drastically change the ways the surface and underground transport systems functions. So why do authorities want to increase transport fares?

Beijing subway yields relatively low revenue because of the flat fare of 2 yuan ($0.32) for one trip (which could extend from 500 meters to 88 kilometers - not including the airport line), creating a fiscal burden on the subway operators. It also affects the efficient allocation of resources, because without charging the appropriate fees for a service it is difficult to determine its true demand and, hence, the areas in which it needs improvements.

Across the world, the prevalent trend is to tap the revenue potential in the transport sector and thus not to keep fares low. For example, the London tube charges £4.50 ($7.7) for one trip within zone 1 (£2.10 for Oyster card holders). Similarly, in Hong Kong, the MTR charges between HK$4 ($0.51) and $46 a trip.

Fare pricing plays an important role in rationalizing passengers' behavior, particularly their choice between subways and buses. Given the 2-yuan fare in Beijing, some subway lines have to cope with passenger flows that exceed the capacity by up to 144 percent during peak hours, almost comparable to 171 percent in Japan - the world's most congested subway system. In contrast, Beijing's buses still have a supply surplus; according to rough estimates the existing fleet of buses could serve an additional 4 million passengers a day.

A reasonable fare structure, therefore, could prompt some price-sensitive commuters to use buses, or change their commuting timings or destinations, and thus ease the pressure on the metro.

But any increase in subway fares has to be justified in terms of social equity and benefits. An increase in fares would create social equity concerns, because mostly low-income people rely on public transport to commute to and from work. Besides, high subway fares could encourage more people to use cars, leading to more congestion and air pollution.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 宾川县| 东城区| 阜新| 大庆市| 乐昌市| 广河县| 甘孜| 信宜市| 蓬溪县| 天峨县| 巴南区| 大埔县| 东丽区| 泌阳县| 锦州市| 汉寿县| 健康| 山西省| 武宁县| 中牟县| 东明县| 莱芜市| 广丰县| 白城市| 龙江县| 神木县| 重庆市| 云安县| 南宫市| 北碚区| 治县。| 交城县| 承德市| 昌黎县| 浙江省| 同江市| 伊金霍洛旗| 双城市| 延安市| 桑日县| 承德县| 聊城市| 尼木县| 界首市| 宿松县| 泸溪县| 土默特右旗| 桓仁| 龙海市| 汉川市| 谢通门县| 高陵县| 石棉县| 台湾省| 黔西县| 温州市| 监利县| 德清县| 资溪县| 清苑县| 莱芜市| 托里县| 衡阳市| 比如县| 民乐县| 金门县| 柳林县| 荣成市| 内黄县| 漯河市| 莆田市| 江西省| 游戏| 许昌县| 周宁县| 凤山市| 蓝山县| 阿拉尔市| 内乡县| 平果县| 普安县| 海兴县|