男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Featured Contributors

Let the market determine the number of Chinese children

By Colin Speakman (chinadaily.com.cn) Updated: 2015-11-06 21:18

Let the market determine the number of Chinese children

A boy with his younger brother. [Photo provided to chinadaily.com.cn]

The news that after 35 years, China's one child policy is to be abolished, could not come too soon. It is a policy well-past its sell-by date. The policy, born in an era of concerns about too rapid population growth, had its merits then, when having several children was seen as an investment, especially the desire for one or more sons. Having children was more affordable then.

It was still a divisive policy, as those in the private sector with money could just pay a fine and carry on building a larger family, while those employed by the state could be punished with lack of promotion, demotion, even job loss as well as a fine. In the rural areas, extra children were hidden, brought up by a childless relative, while city dwellers found it difficult to hide extra children.

Yet the policy is believed to have prevented China's population from being 400 million more than today. Yet the biggest result that prompted the change are worries over an aging population with estimates that by 2050 one quarter of a population of around 1.4 billion will be aged over 65. That is a lot of folks dependent on a smaller working population to support. At an individual level it would be hard for 1 couple to support four parents later in life.

Let the market determine the number of Chinese children

However without any laws, we see in western countries couples choosing to be childless or limiting themselves to one child. Reasons include priority given to career development by women and the high costs of raising a child which prohibit taking on a second. Today in China the costs of raising a child are much higher than a decade ago. Raising children in the ever expanding cities is a hard challenge which cannot always be helped by handy local grandparents. More females than males are graduating from universities - surely they are looking to a career and not just becoming a housewife? No disrespect to that role, but will many actually want to take an extended break from work to have two children? Those that see family building as their role may want more.

The conclusion is that China should leave family size to market forces driven by economic realities and personal choices. I suspect that many young Chinese couples will choose not to have two children - the evidence from what happened when China allowed two children if one parent was an only child, is not encouraging as not many people took up the opportunity. If I am right, the structural problems in the population will only be partly solved, so why not allow other families to have three children to help balance things out? This is much more sensible and all policies restricting choice in family size should be abolished.

The author is an economist and Director of China Programs at CAPA, The Global Education Network, a US/UK based organization that cooperates with Capital Normal University and East China Normal University.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 拉萨市| 阿克陶县| 昭通市| 高要市| 繁峙县| 班戈县| 哈巴河县| 武威市| 休宁县| 峨山| 枞阳县| 黔西| 西华县| 广宗县| 宜黄县| 克拉玛依市| 嘉善县| 忻城县| 板桥市| 遂溪县| 资源县| 昌平区| 甘谷县| 巴楚县| 容城县| 哈密市| 湖口县| 秭归县| 姜堰市| 仙桃市| 铁力市| 留坝县| 温宿县| 安阳县| 禹城市| 桑日县| 加查县| 徐闻县| 柳江县| 通道| 杭锦后旗| 徐汇区| 海伦市| 神木县| 石林| 三河市| 平南县| 曲沃县| 枞阳县| 天津市| 梁山县| 宜春市| 恩施市| 三门峡市| 尉氏县| 南澳县| 陈巴尔虎旗| 永济市| 咸阳市| 紫金县| 漳州市| 阿拉善右旗| 太仓市| 祥云县| 乐清市| 北流市| 富蕴县| 巴彦县| 衡水市| 常州市| 海城市| 东城区| 砚山县| 利辛县| 海兴县| 黄山市| 聂拉木县| 金门县| 青田县| 隆安县| 山东省| 新建县|