男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Should Britain's charity begin at home?

By Harvey Morris | China Daily | Updated: 2016-11-26 09:00

The commission focused its criticism on the manner in which the department had wound down its aid program to countries such as China and its failure to explain fully to the public that some expenditure was continuing. It quoted Chinese government officials and some of the aid department's own local staff as saying the transition was too quick, with only nine months between the formal announcement of the end of bilateral aid and the closure of programs.

The watchdog gave no explanation for the department's seeming reticence about the continuing aid. It noted, however, that the original announcement of program closures followed "sharp criticism in parts of the UK media of providing aid to countries that were increasingly important economic powers in their own right".

The commission report echoed the view expressed last year by Parliament's International Development Committee that the government needed to stand up for its policy of continued cooperation with countries such as China rather than handing ammunition to its critics by not explaining its perfectly legitimate activities.

Successive UK governments have pledged to spend 0.7 percent of the national wealth on international aid, about twice the level of its partners in the Group of Seven rich economies. But for every politician who believes it is money well spent in terms of wielding Britain's soft power, there is another who believes the money is wasted.

Aside from critics who repeat the mantra that "charity begins at home", there are those who argue that aid to the poorest countries does not improve the lot of the "have-nots" but merely enriches the "haves".

Outside the traditional circle of Western donors, China is the biggest provider of foreign aid. However, Beijing's philosophy is to regard less-fortunate developing countries as business partners rather than aid recipients. That means much of Chinese aid is in the nontraditional form of export credits, preferential trade arrangements and government support for Chinese companies investing in developing countries.

While the watchdog report suggests China appreciates the continued assistance it receives from Britain in advancing its own donor strategy, maybe there is an opportunity for China to offer some advice of its own.

The writer is a senior media consultant for China Daily UK.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 郓城县| 合阳县| 诸城市| 方城县| 渝北区| 栖霞市| 永胜县| 沾化县| 广丰县| 偃师市| 永新县| 商南县| 千阳县| 崇左市| 台东县| 长岛县| 乾安县| 涞源县| 玉溪市| 饶平县| 铁力市| 灵川县| 万安县| 中卫市| 霍邱县| 新丰县| 石河子市| 卫辉市| 磐安县| 永康市| 荆门市| 饶河县| 宁晋县| 成安县| 柯坪县| 京山县| 城市| 米林县| 武胜县| 交口县| 兰溪市| 永川市| 延安市| 呼玛县| 井陉县| 和静县| 浪卡子县| 大理市| 大名县| 屯门区| 衡阳县| 达日县| 兖州市| 梁山县| 五寨县| 满城县| 洞口县| 杭锦旗| 府谷县| 当涂县| 沂南县| 雅安市| 秭归县| 西畴县| 黄大仙区| 望奎县| 苏州市| 左云县| 广元市| 辉县市| 阿图什市| 尼玛县| 呼伦贝尔市| 大渡口区| 浠水县| 南郑县| 舞钢市| 阿克苏市| 涿州市| 讷河市| 海安县| 蒲城县|