男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Judges cannot be both referees and players

China Daily | Updated: 2017-02-16 07:54

Judges cannot be both referees and players

A file photo of China’s Supreme People's Court (SPC). [Photo: Xinhua]

Officials of the local court and procuratorate?in Lulong county, North China's Hebei province, attended a recent training session on attracting investments to boost the local economy that was sponsored by the local government, less than a week after the Supreme People's Court officially prohibited their involvement in attracting investment. Beijing Youth Daily commented on Wednesday:

The Lulong government defended the training session as necessary so the judges would be better able to mediate cases, but the judicial officials' presence at a training session aimed at attracting investment is questionable.

It has to be made clear that administrative matters, ranging from attracting investment to urban relocation programs that often involve the demolition of resident's homes, are the concern of local governments and it is the judicial departments' job to make sure the cases brought to trial are fairly and properly dealt with.

Getting them involved in the implementation of executive orders could, on the one hand, mean they do not stay within the boundaries and obligations of judicial power. While on the other hand, giving judges assignments beyond their duties could overburden them at the cost of efficiency. That miscarriages of justice have been belatedly rectified in some cases is a case in point.

Judges have the duty to safeguard social justice and settle legal disputes. Attracting investments to boost the local economy in most cases features intertwined interests concerning local governments and non-local investors, as well as the demolition of old buildings and the construction of new ones.

They should not be introduced as advisors and mediators to attract investments. There could be a risk of premature judicial intervention if the local officials insist that judges come to their aid whenever disputes occur.

That being the case, people have good reasons to question the local court's role if it is both a player and a referee at the same time. It is important that judicial organs are not misused as an affiliation of the government.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 象州县| 敖汉旗| 玉环县| 施甸县| 高碑店市| 靖州| 贺兰县| 达州市| 万州区| 沂水县| 英吉沙县| 昭觉县| 九江县| 唐河县| 贺兰县| 华亭县| 东兰县| 铅山县| 丰台区| 汝阳县| 吉木萨尔县| 望都县| 平罗县| 保定市| 桐城市| 那曲县| 磐石市| 门头沟区| 巴中市| 阆中市| 桦川县| 维西| 化州市| 合肥市| 聂荣县| 永和县| 彰化县| 余干县| 怀安县| 虞城县| 宁陕县| 安阳县| 叶城县| 文昌市| 永平县| 普定县| 房产| 沐川县| 宜州市| 临颍县| 鄱阳县| 通榆县| 黑山县| 沁水县| 峨眉山市| 武陟县| 都安| 孟连| 江都市| 江门市| 丁青县| 凌源市| 烟台市| 闵行区| 常宁市| 河北区| 仁化县| 文登市| 农安县| 双鸭山市| 论坛| 龙泉市| 北流市| 额尔古纳市| 佛学| 阳谷县| 双流县| 内江市| 二手房| 博白县| 唐河县| 阿拉善右旗|