男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Rules required to regulate rising car-sharing business

China Daily | Updated: 2017-02-21 07:50

Rules required to regulate rising car-sharing business

Shouqi and Homeinns announced their strategic partnership in Beijing on Aug 11, 2016, aimed at easing tailored services for travelers, such as simplifying the process of picking up and returning hired cars. [Photo/VCG]

Car-sharing services?provided by companies such as Gofun Chuxing launched by Beijing Shouqi Group and Car2go under the automotive giant Daimler AG, are gaining popularity among young people in mega cities such as Beijing and Shanghai. Beijing News commented on Monday:

The sharing cars, mostly electric vehicles, are ready for use after the registration process has been completed, which takes just a few minutes, and they cost even less than taking a cab. Take for example Gofun, which has 1,100 cars in Beijing with more coming once its application for license plates is approved. Apart from a refundable deposit of 699 yuan ($102), one only has to spend 1 yuan per kilometer and 0.1 yuan per minute for a ride.

In comparison, traditional car-rental services charge on a daily basis-meaning that only long-distance commuters are likely to use them-and they are often expensive.

Car-sharing services, on the other hand, can be rather flexible in offering tailored driving choices and are more environment friendly. They thus have greater potential to attract enough customers to make the companies profitable.

What the local governments should do with the emerging industry is to encourage and support its growth instead of nipping it in the bud with excessive restrictions. Insufficient space for urban parking is no doubt a problem and the lack of chargers for electric vehicles is another. They cannot be solved by the car-sharing service providers alone.

That is to say car-sharing needs proper supervision. Like their bike-sharing counterparts, the car-sharing companies are struggling to keep illegal parking in check.

This requires the authorities to stipulate rules to protect the interests of both the car-sharing service providers and their users. In other words, they should learn the lesson from the previous failure to streamline the ride-hailing services, which were not put on the right track until they were legalized last year.

Sitting on the sidelines will only create gray areas where speculators prosper and decent players suffer, and placing a ban on everything is simply not possible after the country stressed the need to nurture the sharing economy.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 赤峰市| 阿城市| 定州市| 尼玛县| 西丰县| 闵行区| 永平县| 吉安市| 茶陵县| 西安市| 温泉县| 阿尔山市| 淮北市| 嘉峪关市| 祥云县| 烟台市| 长兴县| 湾仔区| 仙桃市| 垦利县| 雅江县| 涞源县| 赤水市| 子长县| 宽城| 陕西省| 尉犁县| 建昌县| 托克逊县| 抚松县| 崇信县| 千阳县| 宁城县| 连云港市| 定襄县| 上蔡县| 道孚县| 新化县| 麦盖提县| 大冶市| 仁寿县| 九龙城区| 曲靖市| 嵩明县| 屯昌县| 广南县| 霞浦县| 奇台县| 喀喇沁旗| 中阳县| 云龙县| 涿州市| 津市市| 古浪县| 桐乡市| 千阳县| 太原市| 虹口区| 英超| 松江区| 左云县| 秦安县| 古浪县| 鄂托克前旗| 武汉市| 台北县| 株洲市| 怀安县| 青州市| 定结县| 景泰县| 香河县| 鄱阳县| 青冈县| 九江市| 和龙市| 五原县| 柞水县| 伊宁市| 台山市| 将乐县| 沙河市|