男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Forces fighting fake goods would be more effective working together

China Daily | Updated: 2017-03-01 07:57

Forces fighting fake goods would be more effective working together

A view of Alibaba Group's headquarters in Hangzhou, East China's Zhejiang province, March 21, 2016. [Photo/Xinhua]

ON MONDAY, DOMESTIC E-COMMERCE GIANT ALIBABA announced that in 2016 it had found 4,495 instances of businesses making or selling fake goods. The judiciary investigated 1,184 of them, yet only 33 people have received sentences. Beijing News comments:

Fake goods have always been a major headache for Alibaba. Yet the number of people found guilty of making and selling fake goods is so small that people accuse the judiciary of not enforcing the law properly.

This is not the case, as the judiciary has on several occasions vowed to strike the illegal interest chain of counterfeit goods. The true cause is Alibaba has the information while the judiciary has the power, yet the two do not work well together to tackle the issue.

E-commerce platforms such as Alibaba have information on all the businesses they host. For instance, the IP address, physical address and ID number of anybody who sells goods on their platform is recorded, and Alibaba could easily locate a seller identified as retailer of fake goods. Yet Alibaba does not have the power to enforce law, so it cannot punish the fake goods sellers, nor is it the holder of the trademarks being violated so it cannot sue the fake goods sellers.

The judiciary has the power but lacks the necessary evidence to prove a case, since, when it comes to e-commerce, the judiciary's evidence requirements are not up to date with modern technologies.

The companies holding trademarks, the e-commerce platform, and the judiciary are all working to fight fake goods, but it seems they are working in different directions and they lack the necessary coordination.

This situation must be changed. The judiciary needs to upgrade its concept of evidence and learn more about modern technologies, while the e-commerce platforms need to explain their evidence in plainer words, so that the forces fighting against fake goods can more effectively unite.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 姜堰市| 苏尼特右旗| 兴业县| 曲松县| 建德市| 泰顺县| 荆州市| 达拉特旗| 贡嘎县| 红安县| 海南省| 革吉县| 宜昌市| 修文县| 静安区| 晋中市| 蓝山县| 维西| 晋江市| 武宁县| 安国市| 九台市| 永登县| 高唐县| 搜索| 无锡市| 仙桃市| 屯留县| 屏东市| 定襄县| 泸定县| 梓潼县| 南雄市| 昌图县| 铁岭市| 望谟县| 文登市| 望城县| 新晃| 沙雅县| 宿松县| 宜章县| 秦安县| 九龙坡区| 泸州市| 蓬安县| 蒙山县| 潜山县| 赣州市| 平罗县| 克东县| 渭源县| 商城县| 堆龙德庆县| 宿州市| 申扎县| 始兴县| 灵武市| 吉林省| 华安县| 北碚区| 梓潼县| 吴江市| 明光市| 蒙阴县| 锡林郭勒盟| 洛南县| 光泽县| 溧水县| 安龙县| 通道| 桃江县| 湄潭县| 宁阳县| 东城区| 新邵县| 乌鲁木齐市| 岑巩县| 连南| 沙湾县| 营山县| 佛山市|