男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Draft on govt info disclosure too vague

China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-20 07:48

Draft on govt info disclosure too vague

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang speaks at the Central Urban Work Conference in Beijing, Dec 22, 2015.[Photo/Xinhua]

A DRAFT AMENDMENT to the 2008 regulation on government information disclosure has been issued by the State Council, China's Cabinet, to solicit public opinions. Southern Metropolis Daily commented on Monday:

It is praiseworthy that the draft does not shun questions over the increasing public calls for government information and the obligation of government organs to disclose it.

The constant disclosure "tussle" between people who want to know more about local governance and civil servants wary of divulging sensitive information has, in fact, found expression in the making and revision of relevant legal codes.

That explains why the latest draft reiterates the principle that government information disclosure should be the norm and nondisclosure exceptional. For that to have teeth, legislative revisions are needed to clarify what is eligible for disclosure and what is not.

There should be little controversy over the information subject to specially designed laws and regulations that is not to be made public under any circumstances. On the other hand, government information that risks "endangering national security, economic security, and social stability", yet can be disclosed in the appropriate circumstances, is often inaccessible.

The draft amendment is right to clarify that the disclosure, if deemed by same-level local governments as a potential threat to public security and social stability or the implementation of key financial policies, will not have to be made.

The vague wording and the lack of concrete criteria, however, may leave room for government departments not to make public information that they should. What constitutes potential security threats and the same-level governments' authority in deciding what to disclose, is not set out clearly enough to convince people that the right to withhold critical information is not being abused. Public supervision of government may be kept at bay in this way.

Making public government information is now a step that cannot be taken back. The disclosure of government information may be better decided by the top legislative body, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, rather than the governments themselves.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 连州市| 宁津县| 定州市| 竹山县| 横峰县| 基隆市| 襄汾县| 准格尔旗| 通城县| 福清市| 安义县| 改则县| 富宁县| 军事| 鄂伦春自治旗| 耿马| 仁怀市| 黄骅市| 吴旗县| 广南县| 宜城市| 崇礼县| 建始县| 承德市| 崇州市| 昌吉市| 云浮市| 中牟县| 兴海县| 咸丰县| 遂宁市| 浑源县| 南澳县| 榕江县| 正阳县| 新泰市| 阜阳市| 额尔古纳市| 宁国市| 福海县| 富源县| 丹凤县| 滦平县| 防城港市| 泰顺县| 黎川县| 青海省| 琼中| 香港| 墨竹工卡县| 德州市| 宝丰县| 左权县| 平度市| 和硕县| 芒康县| 宿迁市| 岗巴县| 香河县| 嘉定区| 石渠县| 兴义市| 嵩明县| 磐石市| 绥化市| 广元市| 永寿县| 都昌县| 孙吴县| 丹巴县| 开阳县| 绥阳县| 黑山县| 民权县| 右玉县| 兴安县| 察隅县| 威海市| 静安区| 卢湾区| 中卫市| 水富县|