男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Shared bikes should also be safe bikes

By Cui Shoufeng | China Daily | Updated: 2017-08-02 06:54

Shared bikes should also be safe bikes
SHI YU/CHINA DAILY

Editor's Note: The parents of an 11-year-old boy, who was killed in a collision with a coach while riding one of Ofo's shared bikes in Shanghai in March, have sued the company and the coach driver, demanding 8.78 million yuan ($1.32 million) in compensation. They also want Ofo to replace its bike locks with smarter ones. Two experts share their views with China Daily's Cui Shoufeng. Excerpts follow:

Smarter locks cannot rule out accidents

Judging by the evidence available, the legal guardians of the 11-year-old, including his parents and school, should be primarily responsible for his death. Children of his age are deemed to have limited capacity for civil conduct and, hence, their civil actions should have the consent of or be ratified by their guardians. Besides, Chinese law prohibits children below 12 from riding bikes on public roads.

The coach driver's responsibility is comparatively less as the boy "stole" the bike by cracking the combination code to its lock and was riding on the wrong side of the road when the bus hit him.

The question then is: How much responsibility the bike-sharing company should shoulder?

The locks of many Ofo bikes are not difficult to open, because their four-digit combination code does not change after use and can be easily obtained. Perhaps that's why Ofo has been updating the old mechanical locks since March. The new, smart locks are harder to crack, but they have not yet been fitted to all Ofo bikes.

From the legal point of view, however, Ofo cannot be held responsible for the accident. And whether or not it has violated tort law should be decided by the cause of the boy's death. But if the locks of all Ofo bikes have design flaws and the boy cracked the combination code on one of them, Ofo should be held accountable.

Ofo might be exempted from blame, however, if it is established that the boy found the bike unlocked, because the violation of tort law consists of illegal acts and intentional mistakes. The company has moral and technological obligations, though, to update its products and pay compensation to the boy's parents. But accidents like this are not always foreseeable and cannot be avoided even after Ofo equips all its bikes with smarter locks.

Zhu Wei, deputy director of the Communication Law Center at China University of Political Science and Law

Previous 1 2 Next

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 元朗区| 海南省| 百色市| 云林县| 常宁市| 沐川县| 浮梁县| 慈溪市| 花莲县| 三亚市| 宝鸡市| 高密市| 玉树县| 高陵县| 福建省| 蓬安县| 屯昌县| 石嘴山市| 沽源县| 运城市| 襄垣县| 沙雅县| 攀枝花市| 麻城市| 奎屯市| 海南省| 长岛县| 和政县| 清流县| 临湘市| 蕲春县| 贵德县| 武乡县| 昔阳县| 宁波市| 湖口县| 陈巴尔虎旗| 仁寿县| 河源市| 乐亭县| 甘肃省| 佛冈县| 舒兰市| 从江县| 明水县| 安丘市| 和林格尔县| 韩城市| 阳新县| 门头沟区| 内丘县| 景东| 乌拉特前旗| 宕昌县| 兴业县| 含山县| 乐清市| 凤翔县| 阳曲县| 巴林左旗| 囊谦县| 寿光市| 鄱阳县| 太仓市| 民乐县| 新宁县| 冷水江市| 雷州市| 罗山县| 辽宁省| 英吉沙县| 涪陵区| 怀柔区| 遵化市| 濉溪县| 恩施市| 张家川| 瑞金市| 建始县| 肇庆市| 加查县| 察隅县|