男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Unappealing side effects of sharing economy

China Daily | Updated: 2017-04-06 07:06
Share
Share - WeChat

More than 4,000 illegal parking bicycles impounded by authorities in Shanghai, March 1, 2017. [Photo/VCG]

LARGE NUMBERS OF TOURISTS flocked to Shenzhen Bay Park in Guangdong province on Monday using bikes they rented via bike-sharing service apps such as Mobike. There were so many cyclists that they blocked most of the bike lanes in the park and caused great inconvenience to other visitors. Southern Metropolis Daily commented on Wednesday:

A glance at the congested bike lanes in Shenzhen Bay Park would be enough to give people goose bumps. During the three-day Tomb Sweeping Day travel rush that ended on Tuesday, an average of 300,000 tourists visited the park each day, many of them riding station-less sharing bikes.

The influx of enthusiastic riders made park management difficult, as randomly parked bikes turned the beach bike lane into a makeshift parking lot. That explains why after the influx of cyclists on Monday, sharing bikes were forbidden to enter the park grounds the next day.

The rise of the sharing economy has been applauded, but the side effects are beginning to emerge. The parking chaos at Shenzhen Bay Park is but one example, but it will not be the last, as more bikes hit the road and management of them struggles to keep up.

Despite the increasing popularity of the bike-hire services, service providers have to make sure their bikes do not impose a burden on social governance.

It is laudable that several bike-sharing service companies have sought to cooperate with the Shenzhen government after their bikes flooded into the park, in an attempt to make amends. And their success in keeping most riders at bay the next day means that efficient management is possible if preemptive measures are taken and notice given in advance.

On its part, the Shenzhen government should have anticipated the trouble caused by the unlimited entry of bikes into the park. Although it is making progress in managing the sharing bikes, it has a lot more to do to help sharing bikes become an integral part of urban life. Specific boundaries have to be drawn with regard to where bikes can be left by their users.

Ultimately, a consensus needs to be reached among local governments, bike-hire companies, and customers that they have a shared interest in managing the use of such bikes. Whether the bike-sharing services will thrive hinges on flexible governmental guidance, the self-discipline of users, and the bike providers' efforts to hold unruly users to account.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 临猗县| 石柱| 西平县| 岳普湖县| 方城县| 甘洛县| 大姚县| 商水县| 民县| 手机| 讷河市| 滨州市| 长寿区| 巩留县| 山西省| 黔西| 冀州市| 油尖旺区| 曲水县| 鄯善县| 布尔津县| 荔浦县| 双峰县| 宁化县| 海原县| 云霄县| 钟山县| 临猗县| 阿尔山市| 华阴市| 乌鲁木齐县| 德江县| 仙游县| 上饶县| 阳东县| 白山市| 博湖县| 石泉县| 吉安市| 安吉县| 乌鲁木齐县| 绵竹市| 太谷县| 竹溪县| 皋兰县| 白城市| 逊克县| 梧州市| 双流县| 宁安市| 包头市| 丰原市| 张掖市| 柞水县| 峨边| 邢台县| 湛江市| 正蓝旗| 巴楚县| 大邑县| 青铜峡市| 昭通市| 句容市| 泽普县| 安阳县| 正安县| 定襄县| 长春市| 九江县| 呼和浩特市| 双桥区| 商水县| 苍溪县| 封丘县| 鄢陵县| 同江市| 陈巴尔虎旗| 黄浦区| 加查县| 长岛县| 札达县| 台东县|