男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Unappealing side effects of sharing economy

China Daily | Updated: 2017-04-06 07:06
Share
Share - WeChat

More than 4,000 illegal parking bicycles impounded by authorities in Shanghai, March 1, 2017. [Photo/VCG]

LARGE NUMBERS OF TOURISTS flocked to Shenzhen Bay Park in Guangdong province on Monday using bikes they rented via bike-sharing service apps such as Mobike. There were so many cyclists that they blocked most of the bike lanes in the park and caused great inconvenience to other visitors. Southern Metropolis Daily commented on Wednesday:

A glance at the congested bike lanes in Shenzhen Bay Park would be enough to give people goose bumps. During the three-day Tomb Sweeping Day travel rush that ended on Tuesday, an average of 300,000 tourists visited the park each day, many of them riding station-less sharing bikes.

The influx of enthusiastic riders made park management difficult, as randomly parked bikes turned the beach bike lane into a makeshift parking lot. That explains why after the influx of cyclists on Monday, sharing bikes were forbidden to enter the park grounds the next day.

The rise of the sharing economy has been applauded, but the side effects are beginning to emerge. The parking chaos at Shenzhen Bay Park is but one example, but it will not be the last, as more bikes hit the road and management of them struggles to keep up.

Despite the increasing popularity of the bike-hire services, service providers have to make sure their bikes do not impose a burden on social governance.

It is laudable that several bike-sharing service companies have sought to cooperate with the Shenzhen government after their bikes flooded into the park, in an attempt to make amends. And their success in keeping most riders at bay the next day means that efficient management is possible if preemptive measures are taken and notice given in advance.

On its part, the Shenzhen government should have anticipated the trouble caused by the unlimited entry of bikes into the park. Although it is making progress in managing the sharing bikes, it has a lot more to do to help sharing bikes become an integral part of urban life. Specific boundaries have to be drawn with regard to where bikes can be left by their users.

Ultimately, a consensus needs to be reached among local governments, bike-hire companies, and customers that they have a shared interest in managing the use of such bikes. Whether the bike-sharing services will thrive hinges on flexible governmental guidance, the self-discipline of users, and the bike providers' efforts to hold unruly users to account.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 台州市| 和硕县| 荥经县| 桂东县| 县级市| 冀州市| 刚察县| 雅安市| 乌拉特后旗| SHOW| 田阳县| 拉萨市| 台北市| 咸丰县| 朝阳市| 和林格尔县| 大化| 镇赉县| 盐边县| 融水| 怀宁县| 内江市| 华宁县| 尼勒克县| 黑山县| 通许县| 都江堰市| 禄丰县| 松潘县| 福贡县| 哈巴河县| 茌平县| 高安市| 石泉县| 喜德县| 湖州市| 秦安县| 阜宁县| 麻江县| 清涧县| 建始县| 麻栗坡县| 锡林郭勒盟| 武功县| 元朗区| 辛集市| 喀喇沁旗| 顺义区| 旬邑县| 德格县| 微山县| 襄城县| 沭阳县| 大港区| 綦江县| 庆元县| 苏尼特右旗| 通道| 菏泽市| 馆陶县| 四平市| 祁门县| 武威市| 喀什市| 澳门| 虞城县| 嫩江县| 闻喜县| 奈曼旗| 景谷| 罗城| 定安县| 盖州市| 贵阳市| 灌云县| 突泉县| 定陶县| 大方县| 台北市| 襄汾县| 长岛县| 中江县|