男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Fees charged drivers must be legal and reasonable

China Daily | Updated: 2017-05-08 07:39
Share
Share - WeChat

A LAWYER IN GUANGZHOU, South China's Guangdong province, is suing a local expressway company after he was charged 10 yuan ($1.4) for using a highway designed to link non-adjacent towns to an expressway, which he claims he did not use. Legal Daily commented on Saturday:

The linking lanes usually have a tollgate on one end and a non-adjacent town on the other. In some cases, drivers who reach the tollgate from other lanes rather than tolled highway are still charged the extra fee. The Guangzhou lawyer is not alone in questioning whether a driver should pay for the highway linking to an expressway if he or she does not use it.

Expressway companies argue that they have the right to charge such a fee to cover the construction and maintenance costs of these lanes. While many drivers refuse to buy such an explanation because they believe that the pre-express lanes are not expressways and hence any such charges, which can be more expensive than toll fees, are illegitimate.

Of all the controversies surrounding the case, one thing is clear: Drivers should not be charged for a service they do not use. What the Guangzhou expressway company has done does not hold any legal water, despite the fact that it assumes that any driver arriving at the tollgate has used the highway providing access to the expressway.

It is unlikely that the local transportation authorities permit drivers to be charged a fee when they do not use roads that link to expressways, and even if they do, such a decision is still subject to relevant laws such as the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests and the regulations on toll roads. If the toll authorization is misinterpreted, whether on purpose or not, the expressway company should at least explain why it did so and on what grounds it justifies charging all drivers indiscriminately.

The rapid expansion of expressway network in China is praiseworthy, but it also has caused problems. In addition to charging fees fairly and legally, local transportation officials should launch a thorough review of their road management to protect the legitimate interests of drivers.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 阿拉善盟| 仁怀市| 志丹县| 武功县| 郎溪县| 雷波县| 盐亭县| 泸水县| 永和县| 广饶县| 和田县| 远安县| 广宁县| 石河子市| 青龙| 天等县| 丹江口市| 郁南县| 乐都县| 依兰县| 呼玛县| 扎鲁特旗| 原阳县| 神池县| 来凤县| 承德市| 宁安市| 赣州市| 武鸣县| 花垣县| 石楼县| 吉木萨尔县| 承德市| 乌兰县| 玛纳斯县| 邻水| 吉木萨尔县| 阿图什市| 建湖县| 土默特右旗| 思茅市| 察哈| 克拉玛依市| 虹口区| 湛江市| 三穗县| 黄陵县| 泽库县| 报价| 常德市| 喀喇沁旗| 江山市| 双柏县| 房山区| 和田市| 巴彦县| 德州市| 玛纳斯县| 新蔡县| 西宁市| 阜平县| 正蓝旗| 辽源市| 宜兰县| 巴东县| 泗水县| 台东市| 永福县| 明溪县| 奈曼旗| 商城县| 乐山市| 石台县| 江门市| 张家川| 五原县| 瓦房店市| 涿州市| 原平市| 开鲁县| 嵊泗县| 无极县|