男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Fees charged drivers must be legal and reasonable

China Daily | Updated: 2017-05-08 07:39
Share
Share - WeChat

A LAWYER IN GUANGZHOU, South China's Guangdong province, is suing a local expressway company after he was charged 10 yuan ($1.4) for using a highway designed to link non-adjacent towns to an expressway, which he claims he did not use. Legal Daily commented on Saturday:

The linking lanes usually have a tollgate on one end and a non-adjacent town on the other. In some cases, drivers who reach the tollgate from other lanes rather than tolled highway are still charged the extra fee. The Guangzhou lawyer is not alone in questioning whether a driver should pay for the highway linking to an expressway if he or she does not use it.

Expressway companies argue that they have the right to charge such a fee to cover the construction and maintenance costs of these lanes. While many drivers refuse to buy such an explanation because they believe that the pre-express lanes are not expressways and hence any such charges, which can be more expensive than toll fees, are illegitimate.

Of all the controversies surrounding the case, one thing is clear: Drivers should not be charged for a service they do not use. What the Guangzhou expressway company has done does not hold any legal water, despite the fact that it assumes that any driver arriving at the tollgate has used the highway providing access to the expressway.

It is unlikely that the local transportation authorities permit drivers to be charged a fee when they do not use roads that link to expressways, and even if they do, such a decision is still subject to relevant laws such as the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests and the regulations on toll roads. If the toll authorization is misinterpreted, whether on purpose or not, the expressway company should at least explain why it did so and on what grounds it justifies charging all drivers indiscriminately.

The rapid expansion of expressway network in China is praiseworthy, but it also has caused problems. In addition to charging fees fairly and legally, local transportation officials should launch a thorough review of their road management to protect the legitimate interests of drivers.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 贺兰县| 闵行区| 岫岩| 湖口县| 长沙县| 海原县| 元阳县| 鄱阳县| 宜君县| 抚松县| 柳州市| 长春市| 蒲城县| 古交市| 道孚县| 大名县| 栾城县| 甘谷县| 江阴市| 乌兰浩特市| 琼结县| 新河县| 桓仁| 邹平县| 华亭县| 纳雍县| 高碑店市| 汾西县| 周口市| 兴文县| 察隅县| 永平县| 黔东| 旺苍县| 宝鸡市| 平阳县| 绍兴市| 亚东县| 上高县| 宁远县| 武川县| 渝北区| 大宁县| 永年县| 政和县| 繁峙县| 土默特右旗| 望城县| 合阳县| 驻马店市| 璧山县| 江油市| 修水县| 康乐县| 南康市| 万全县| 临汾市| 湄潭县| 德令哈市| 贵溪市| 固原市| 南木林县| 阿荣旗| 迁安市| 临桂县| 永福县| 穆棱市| 彩票| 天水市| 廉江市| 漳浦县| 阜平县| 松滋市| 沙田区| 铅山县| 大荔县| 朝阳县| 商都县| 德化县| 涞水县| 依安县| 镶黄旗|