男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

The not-so-dire future of work in the age of technology

By Zia Qureshi | China Daily | Updated: 2017-10-31 07:33
Share
Share - WeChat

A staff member interacts with Xiaofa, a robot that provides simple legal advice and guidance for litigants, at Beijing No 1 Intermediate People's Court on Oct 12. [Zou Hong/China Daily]

The future of work is a hot topic nowadays. It has inspired a seemingly endless train of analyses, commentaries and conferences, and it featured prominently in recent annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. For good reason: new technologies-digitization, robotics and artificial intelligence-have far-reaching implications for employment. But, contrary to how the story is often framed, a happy ending is possible.

The debate often skews toward the melodramatic, foretelling a future in which machines drive humans out of work. According to some bleak estimates, 47 percent of jobs are at risk in the United States; 57 percent in the OECD countries; two-thirds in developing economies; and half of all jobs globally (about 2 billion).

Similar dire predictions of large-scale job destruction and high tech-driven structural unemployment accompanied previous major episodes of automation, including by renowned economists. But technological change acted as a powerful driver of productivity and employment growth.

One key reason is that the technological innovations that destroy some existing jobs also create new ones. While new technologies reduce demand for low-to middle-skill workers in routine jobs, such as clerical work and repetitive production, they also raise demand for higher-skill workers in technical, creative and managerial fields. A recent analysis estimates that new tasks and job titles explain about half of the recent employment growth in the US.

Given this, the evolution of work should be viewed as a process of dynamic adjustment, not as a fundamentally destructive process that we should seek to slow. To erect barriers to innovation, such as taxes on robots, which some have proposed as a way to ease the pressure on workers, would be counterproductive. Instead, measures should focus on equipping workers with the higher-level skills that a changing labor market demands, and supporting workers during the adjustment process.

So far, education and training have been losing the race with technology. Shortages of the technical and higher-level skills demanded by new technologies are partly responsible for the paradox of booming technology and slowing productivity growth in advanced economies: the shortage of skills has constrained the diffusion of innovations. Imbalances between supply and demand have also fueled income inequality, by increasing the wage premiums that those with the right skills can command.

To address these shortcomings, education and training programs must be revamped and expanded. As the old career path of "learn, work, retire" gives way to one of continuous learning-a process reinforced by the aging of many economies' workforces-options for re-skilling and lifelong education must be scaled up.

This will demand innovations in the content, delivery, and financing of training, as well as new models for public-private partnerships. At the same time, countries must facilitate workers' ability to change jobs through reforms to their labor markets and social safety nets. This means shifting the focus from backward-looking labor-market policies, which seek to protect workers in existing jobs, to future-oriented measures, such as innovative insurance mechanisms and active labor-market policies.

Moreover, social contracts based on formal long-term employer-employee relationships will need to be overhauled, with benefits such as retirement and health care made more portable and adapted to evolving work arrangements, including the expanding "gig" economy.

On both of these fronts, France is setting a positive example. Early this year, the country launched a portable "personal activity account", which enables workers to accrue rights to training across multiple jobs, rather than accumulating such rights only within a specific position or company.

Technological change will continue to pose momentous challenges to labor markets across economies, just as it has in the past. But, with smart, forward-looking policies, we can meet those challenges head-on-and ensure that the future of work is a better job.

The author, a former director of development economics at the World Bank, is a non-resident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Project Syndicate

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 紫金县| 和林格尔县| 合山市| 重庆市| 海安县| 博白县| 河源市| 杭锦后旗| 建湖县| 白城市| 阿克| 通榆县| 淄博市| 万年县| 棋牌| 勐海县| 南澳县| 毕节市| 闸北区| 喀喇沁旗| 敦化市| 永川市| 临猗县| 板桥市| 东方市| 武强县| 雅江县| 秦皇岛市| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 鄂温| 内丘县| 六枝特区| 玉田县| 永修县| 德保县| 佛学| 临沧市| 保山市| 盐亭县| 万山特区| 平昌县| 铜鼓县| 涡阳县| 化德县| 五华县| 承德县| 南昌县| 潼关县| 福清市| 滕州市| 永川市| 鹤山市| 北海市| 吴忠市| 本溪| 芦山县| 南汇区| 泸西县| 吉安市| 开原市| 莒南县| 金阳县| 淮北市| 聂拉木县| 黄骅市| 乡宁县| 合水县| 常州市| 乳源| 华阴市| 永州市| 福贡县| 宁强县| 金湖县| 武安市| 临武县| 嘉峪关市| 东兴市| 新疆| 富民县| 盐池县| 镇坪县|