男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Attack on Confucius Institutes motivated

China Daily | Updated: 2018-04-17 07:09
Share
Share - WeChat

Editor's note: Recently several US senators including Marco Rubio, Tom Cotton and Joe Wilson have appealed to the US Congress to list Confucius Institutes as "foreign agents" according to the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Two experts share their views on the issue with China Daily's Liu Jianna. Excerpts follow:

Hardliners have hijacked the US' trade policies

Li Haidong, a professor at China Foreign Affairs University

The latest assault on Confucius Institutes in the United States is part of concerted efforts to limit the engagement and exchanges with China by forces hostile to China. Even the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission affiliated to the US Congress, in its annual report issued in November, has demanded that Chinese media outlets in the US be listed as "foreign agents".

The Foreign Agents Registration Act was enacted in 1938 to restrict political propaganda by Nazi Germany. According to the US Department of Justice, the act requires people acting as agents of foreign powers in a political or quasi-political capacity to disclose their relationship with the foreign government, and their related activities, including receipts and disbursements of funds. However, the wanton or dubious use of FARA will create serious problems for even normal cultural and civil exchanges between China and the US.

This raises the question: Why some US politicians are targeting cultural programs and exchanges organized by China? The fact is, what we see today is the inevitable development of the debate on China's policies in the US from 2014 to 2016, which gave US hardliners the upper hand in bilateral relations. The debate also revealed the Trump administration is reducing its engagement and increasing its efforts to contain China.

New fronts have opened up in the "anti-China war" thanks to the efforts of the hardliners. Given these facts, the targeting of Chinese cultural and exchange programs by certain US politicians is not hard to explain. Policies unfavorable to China and Sino-US relations are being introduced because there are no political elements to effectively counter the hardliners' assault on China. This shows the tide has turned in Sino-US relations and US President Donald Trump is only following the trend, which incidentally he also helped start.

Despite the US' confrontational moves, however, China can still take some measures to ease tensions on this front. For instance, it can encourage nongovernmental exchanges to clear the US' doubts over government-funded programs. But more dexterity and agility should be applied when dealing with Sino-US ties in these gloomy times.

1 2 Next   >>|
Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 星子县| 福清市| 乌鲁木齐市| 青浦区| 昆明市| 丰镇市| 通化县| 塔城市| 威海市| 东光县| 大邑县| 新和县| 苏尼特左旗| 始兴县| 电白县| 岫岩| 碌曲县| 文水县| 扎赉特旗| 枣庄市| 邹城市| 湖口县| 马边| 西和县| 榆林市| 长泰县| 台南市| 永城市| 新昌县| 南华县| 思茅市| 清远市| 申扎县| 永寿县| 乌鲁木齐县| 乐山市| 桂林市| 广丰县| 冀州市| 永兴县| 梅河口市| 灌阳县| 望都县| 扬中市| 霍城县| 鸡西市| 汾阳市| 云霄县| 上栗县| 花莲市| 顺昌县| 定西市| 井研县| 新安县| 辽阳县| 永昌县| 波密县| 班玛县| 武城县| 澜沧| 拜泉县| 哈尔滨市| 平舆县| 石城县| 灌阳县| 婺源县| 玉环县| 舟曲县| 渝中区| 昆明市| 黑河市| 凉城县| 慈利县| 潜江市| 历史| 龙南县| 汉阴县| 台北市| 塔河县| 乌拉特前旗| 福建省| 濮阳市|