男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Featured Contributors

Why countries should learn from China’s fight against COVID-19

By John Ross | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2020-05-13 15:45
Share
Share - WeChat

Faced with COVID-19’s onslaught, not one single life will be saved in any country by propaganda, politicization of the crisis or similar diversions. On the contrary, many lives are lost as a result of these – because they obstruct the necessary lessons to fight the virus’s attack.

As bluffing will not stop the coronavirus, only correct actions will, it is therefore vital every country learns lessons from China’s successful handling of this crisis.

Some countries have fortunately, and successfully, been able to essentially lock the virus out of their states – New Zealand, for example, basically achieved this. But this path is not open to those countries where the coronavirus has already significantly invaded.

Because the facts show China has been more successful than any other country that suffered a major outbreak in suppressing the virus, any country which does not learn the lessons of China’s success is threatening the safety of its own people.

Other countries, for example South Korea or Slovakia, have been pointed to as successful examples of suppressing the virus. Indeed, compared to the situation unfolding in the US and some West European countries - such as the UK, Italy or Spain - these places have been highly successful. Every single possible lesson must be drawn from all such countries.

In measuring success in fighting the virus a single criterion is decisive - people’s lives, not words. Given countries’ different populations, the most meaningful indicator of success or failure in containing/suppressing the coronavirus is deaths per capita.

Based on World Health Organization daily situation reports, China has suffered 3.3 deaths per million of population from COVID-19. Even a relatively successful country such as South Korea has suffered 4.9 per million, and the Slovak Republic 4.8 deaths per million – that is, 50 percent higher death rates than China. 

The situation in the US and some countries in Western Europe is incomparably worse. The US has suffered 211 deaths per million, the UK 465 deaths per million, Italy 501 deaths per million, and Spain 560 deaths per million. The death rate per capita is sixty times higher in the US than in China, 140 times higher in the UK, 150 times higher in Italy, and in Spain 170 times higher.

What is the conclusion that flows from these facts? China was the first country to suffer the virus’s onslaught – the one country which did not, due to China’s international alerts, have any forewarning of what was coming.

It was in late December 2019 that the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention detected cases of “pneumonia of unknown cause”. On Dec 30, the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission issued an urgent notification to medical institutions ordering efforts to treat such patients. Starting Dec 31, the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission released briefings on the pneumonia outbreak.

Starting on Jan 3, China regularly informed the WHO and relevant countries, including the US, about the pneumonia outbreak. On January 8 the heads of the China and US Centres for Disease Control (CDCs) talked over the phone to discuss technological exchanges and cooperation.

By Jan 11 China released DNA sequencing data on the new coronavirus –key scientific information for all countries and a remarkable feat in such a short period when at that time there were only 41 known cases of the virus. From that moment every country knew from a scientific point of view the threat it faced.

On Jan 23, China adopted a strict lockdown in Hubei province. This was the decisive moment in fighting the virus. If the virus had spread throughout China hundreds of thousands would have died. While there was a horrific outbreak in Hubei and Wuhan underwent immense suffering, the lockdown prevented the virus from spreading on a large scale into the rest of China.

As the Financial Times’ Martin Wolf and others have pointed out, this was the decisive difference between China’s successful suppression of the virus and the situation in the US and other countries. In China a full-scale outbreak was confined to Hubei, while in the US a large-scale coronavirus outbreak spread throughout the country – as also occurred in some West European countries.

The conclusion from these facts is evident. China was the one country in the world which had no advance knowledge, it forewarned the entire world and was the most successful country in getting the virus under control. Any country not learning from that is not helping, but is endangering its citizens.

John Ross is a senior fellow at the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, Renmin University of China. He was formerly director of economic and business policy for the Mayor of London.

The opinions expressed here are those of the writer and do not represent the views of China Daily and China Daily website.

 

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 伽师县| 乐陵市| 余江县| 兴义市| 西乡县| 徐闻县| 喜德县| 于都县| 南郑县| 当涂县| 尉犁县| 成都市| 山丹县| 武义县| 元阳县| 巴马| 弥渡县| 汶川县| 郧西县| 宝坻区| 石河子市| 邹城市| 鲁山县| 班玛县| 乳山市| 区。| 屯门区| 庐江县| 仙居县| 逊克县| 定襄县| 崇明县| 香格里拉县| 苍南县| 杭锦后旗| 高尔夫| 淮北市| 商城县| 麦盖提县| 石家庄市| 桂阳县| 沙湾县| 南乐县| 明光市| 安吉县| 涡阳县| 辽阳市| 民丰县| 陇西县| 霍城县| 庆云县| 保定市| 贵州省| 绍兴县| 平安县| 同江市| 丹巴县| 汉沽区| 寿光市| 兴文县| 革吉县| 乳源| 兰坪| 板桥市| 疏附县| 淳化县| 县级市| 灌阳县| 江都市| 通道| 资兴市| 河北区| 凤冈县| 房产| 涟水县| 五华县| 武宁县| 永川市| 延庆县| 古浪县| 庄浪县| 武胜县|