男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Environment

IPR cases increase as technology develops

By Cao Yin | China Daily | Updated: 2021-10-22 11:22
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo/IC]

Chinese courts will need to handle a rise in disputes involving intellectual property rights in the face of quickly developing technology, according to a report.

The report on courts' efforts in protecting IPR was submitted to the ongoing session of the National People's Congress Standing Committee, China's top legislature, for review on Thursday.

When introducing the report to national lawmakers, Zhou Qiang, president of the Supreme People's Court, the country's top court, pledged to improve judicial protection rules in new areas, including big data, artificial intelligence and gene technology, and to carry out more research on IPR rules for algorithms, trade secrets and products using artificial intelligence.

He said antimonopoly adjudication rules for internet platforms will be promoted, adding they will also help the judiciary advance in major fields such as technological innovation, information security and livelihood protection.

"We're determined to put more effort into studying new problems involving IPR," he said.

According to the report, the number of IPR-related cases handled by Chinese courts rose to 467,000 last year from 101,000 in 2013.

Many cases involved new areas such as core internet technology, gene technology, information communication, integrated circuits, AI and the online platform economy, the report said.

The new types of disputes have not only created difficulties for judges in ascertaining technological and legal applications, but have also given them bigger challenges in clarifying judicial responsibilities and the boundaries of IPR protection, it added.

"The difficulties and challenges exposed our insufficient studies and research involving the new IPR areas," Zhou said, urging courts across the country to devote more efforts to such matters.

He suggested the top legislature make a special procedural law for handling IPR cases and formulate an IPR code.

He said IPR-related laws should be drafted or improved in fields such as big data, AI and gene technology.

According to the report, China has seen stronger IPR protection and faster development over the past few years, and its judicial team responsible for hearing IPR cases has also become more professional.

The country has built four courts-in Beijing, Shanghai and the provinces of Guangdong and Hainan-that specialize in dealing with IPR-related disputes, reducing the cost of protecting rights for IPR owners or holders and giving harsher punishment to IPR violators, it said.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 乌兰浩特市| 许昌县| 屯留县| 凉山| 栾川县| 潍坊市| 长宁县| 上虞市| 紫阳县| 云浮市| 陵水| 翁牛特旗| 阿拉尔市| 大连市| 榆社县| 东海县| 昌宁县| 池州市| 陵川县| 酒泉市| 远安县| 宿州市| 鄂伦春自治旗| 云霄县| 兴隆县| 台山市| 寿阳县| 上思县| 商南县| 鲜城| 静安区| 巢湖市| 金坛市| 邓州市| 太湖县| 建德市| 武川县| 古丈县| 东港市| 马山县| 雷山县| 河池市| 桦南县| 闽清县| 尼木县| 福泉市| 阿克苏市| 合山市| 水城县| 礼泉县| 黄骅市| 洛川县| 开平市| 肥西县| 彭泽县| 阿拉善右旗| 改则县| 萍乡市| 峨眉山市| 巩义市| 疏附县| 台安县| 合江县| 贺兰县| 宁阳县| 澄迈县| 玛纳斯县| 思茅市| 金湖县| 文昌市| 东明县| 缙云县| 银川市| 夏邑县| 米泉市| 泰和县| 香格里拉县| 恩施市| 瑞丽市| 涞水县| 交口县| 牡丹江市|