男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / China and the World Roundtable

40-year-high US inflation self-inflicted

By Dan Steinbock | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2022-05-16 07:19
Share
Share - WeChat
A man shops at a supermarket in Foster City in California, the United States, April 12, 2022. [Photo/Xinhua]

The US Federal Reserve recently raised its benchmark interest rate by half a percentage point, shifting the target range to 0.75 percent to 1 percent, following a smaller increase in March. It was the Fed's biggest increase in 22 years.

Last fall, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said rising prices were "transitionary" and would not leave "a permanent mark in the form of higher inflation". So, when inflation began to climb up after mid-2021, the Fed ignored it until it soared.

In March, the inflation rate in the United States accelerated to 8.5 percent, the highest since December 1981. It was partly fueled by rising energy and food prices, and the consumer price index, which shot to 6.5 percent, the most in four decades.

Typically, the rapidly increasing energy and food prices are being attributed to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Effectively, they should be associated with economic sanctions which have turned a regional conflict with a limited, short-term trajectory into a global crisis with a broad, protracted horizon. That's the net effect of the hybrid proxy war in Ukraine.

Excluding volatile energy and food categories, the soaring inflation has been associated with pandemic-induced global supply disruptions and the recent COVID-19 outbreaks in China. New cases peaked in China in late April and are now coming down.

But disruptions in the global supply chains may penalize global economic prospects as long as the failed efforts to contain the virus in the West continue to give rise to new waves of variants.

Commodity prices peaked in early March, remain close to the peak level and have soared 39 percent since the beginning of the year. Food prices climbed to an all-time high in March, up nearly 20 percent year-on-year, and remain high in what UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has called the "hurricane of hunger and a meltdown of the global food system", while crude oil price reached a high of $125 per barrel in early March, increasing 43 percent since January.

In Europe, the most exposed region to Russian energy, natural gas price quintupled to a high of 230 euros ($239.04) per megawatt-hour and has dropped to 104 euros, as concerns over Russian supplies have dissipated somewhat, but only temporarily.

Russia is the world's 11th largest economy with GDP of $1.8 trillion. It is the world's largest gas exporter and the second-largest crude oil exporter, and given its key role in global energy supply, Goldman Sachs has warned that the global economy "could soon be faced with one of the largest energy supply shocks ever".

A benign scenario in the Ukraine crisis was possible, but it would have required rapid, proactive diplomacy. Unfortunately, that has not been the priority of the proxy war. As US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said in late April: "We want to see Russia weakened." It was a stunning admission.

The Biden administration is reviewing the excess tariffs imposed on Chinese products ahead of their expiration in July. In fact, some policymakers are calling for reductions in the tariffs in order to provide relief to American consumers struggling with rising prices. These calls are fueled by the fear of a potential Republican landslide win in the midterm elections.

The US' misguided trade wars against China and other large economies have caused irreparable harm to the world economy, by undermining global recovery since 2017. Currently, average tariffs on Chinese imports are levied around 19.3 percent and cover more than two-thirds of all goods the US buys from China.

Yet the US trade deficit has not shrunk, as the Donald Trump and Joe Biden administrations expected. In March, it widened sharply to a record high of $110 billion, due to a broad-based rise in prices, especially as energy imports increased by 10.3 percent to a record high of $352 billion.

The lessons are unambiguous. Unilateral tariffs can resolve neither multilateral challenges nor distortions in the US domestic economy. In effect, recent research suggests that a trade liberalization policy equivalent to a 2-percentage-point reduction in tariffs could reduce US inflation by 1.3 percentage points from the current rate.

However, the Biden administration's priorities have been geopolitical rather than economic. That's precisely why it has continued with Trump's tariffs since January 2021. But, ironically, hoping to kill two birds with one stone, the Biden administration now blames "Trump's tariffs" for the record high inflation. In a disingenuous face-saving measure, the incumbent administration hopes to reframe its economic failures to derail Republican advances in the impending midterm elections.

"Has US inflation peaked?" The New York Times asked several weeks ago. "Has US inflation finally started to slow?" seconded the Financial Times more recently. Recent headlines reflect optimistic but premature hopes that inflation peaked in March.

Yet the Ukraine crisis is far from over, thanks to Biden's proxy war. Moreover, the bottlenecks in the global supply chains are yet to be cleared and could again clog supplies with the emergence of new novel coronavirus variants.

These pressures are likely to weigh on commodity prices longer, particularly if the Biden administration opts for new, ill-advised trade wars and continued misguided sanctions.

Meanwhile, the Fed's aggressive and belated rate hikes are escalating economic challenges in the US and elsewhere. And these could worsen in July, when the Fed plans to start quantitative tightening by culling assets from its $9 trillion balance sheet.

The author is the founder of Difference Group and has served at India, China and America Institute (US), the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China), and the EU Centre (Singapore). The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily. 

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Mother of all sanctions http://www.szjzcy.com/a/202205/16/WS62818a83a310fd2b29e5cd0a.html

Lifting tariffs right choice for Biden http://www.szjzcy.com/a/202205/16/WS62818a7ea310fd2b29e5cd00.html

 

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 且末县| 田林县| 偃师市| 哈巴河县| 镇原县| 丹阳市| 雷山县| 秦皇岛市| 巴彦县| 谢通门县| 蚌埠市| 平罗县| 平利县| 新丰县| 辽源市| 彭州市| 安宁市| 新宁县| 石渠县| 唐河县| 平陆县| 泰兴市| 成武县| 巫山县| 贵州省| 永兴县| 崇左市| 邹城市| 嘉善县| 靖宇县| 钟祥市| 习水县| 巨鹿县| 扶绥县| 清远市| 鄯善县| 申扎县| 德令哈市| 阳泉市| 长春市| 海阳市| 黎城县| 丹凤县| 元江| 醴陵市| 潮州市| 临沭县| 盘锦市| 元朗区| 南江县| 磴口县| 贵港市| 杂多县| 曲阜市| 屯门区| 汶川县| 卢龙县| 上虞市| 浮梁县| 藁城市| 天柱县| 阜平县| 大竹县| 芮城县| 澄迈县| 杭锦后旗| 镇雄县| 探索| 聂拉木县| 宁化县| 三原县| 和平县| 津南区| 昭苏县| 玛纳斯县| 甘孜| 新干县| 阿克苏市| 徐水县| 元朗区| 双流县| 日喀则市|