男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

WTO as a collective global organization should never fall prey to politicization

By Hamzah Rifaat Hussain | CGTN | Updated: 2022-06-13 14:20
Share
Share - WeChat
An American flag flies outside of the US Capitol dome in Washington, US, Jan 15, 2020. [Photo/Agencies]

The 12th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization in Geneva has been described as an immensely significant meeting by Director General of the WTO Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. Since its formation in 1995, the organization is committed to upholding and promoting the spirit of addressing significant global challenges such as food insecurity, unfair trade practices and threats to collective prosperity which continue to haunt its members in 2022. The key, however, lies in ensuring that global deals are struck through consensus while multilateralism is promoted through joint efforts. Unilateral attempts at upsetting principles of fair trade and joint cooperation on the other hand must be denounced and discarded.

The message is clear from the outset. At the opening of the conference, the WHO chief stressed on initiating reforms and ensuring that political will overcomes significant challenges to the world order which is emanating from the crisis in Ukraine and the pandemic. Central to achieving these objectives is to ensure that consensus building prevails over unilateral opposition. Note that the WTO's 164 members must unanimously agree to trading deals for them to materialize where opposition from one state can easily derail and stall progress.

As a result, it is imperative that initiatives such as a global security package seeking to address imminent food shortages are operationalized in the absence of reckless coercion and politicization of the organization, which has been a feature of the American approach towards the WTO.

Take Washington's attempts at replacing trade issues with geopolitics as an example. The United States previously blocked judges to the organization's appellate body and created a system of power relations in trade rather than promoting trade based on international rules and regulations. Such moves had a negative impact on dispute resolution where cases brought before the organization became stretched out without a fixed time line. While former US President Donald Trump and Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer have been sharp critics of the organization and promoted unilateralism, the Joe Biden administration's approach since assuming office in 2021 has not been too dissimilar.

As global supply chains were jolted as a result of the Ukraine crisis, the Biden administration's response was to lobby American allies to suspend trading ties with China and promote initiatives such as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) which have been seen as attempts at economic decoupling from China. Initiatives such as the IPEF also do not include a uniform policy of lowering tariffs which is critical for multilateral trade to flourish.

Similarly, on food insecurity, the United States has imposed draconian sanctions on sovereign countries which has put tremendous pressure on trade while exaggerating the food and energy crisis in the process. As many members of the WTO seek to achieve an end to global hunger and boost agricultural activity through a robust, dynamic and resilient multilateral trading system, the Biden administration's policies have been divisive.

The pursuit of hegemony in 2022 is a challenge to the WTO's aim of promoting equitable and fair global trade order. From potential research initiatives which can facilitate better trade between states to dealing with subjects such as e-commerce and digital trade, great power politics should not hijack the WTO's potential in coming up with holistic solutions to international issues. By adopting policies such as stripping off China, the United States would continue to go against the principles of instituting meaningful reforms. Perhaps it is worthwhile for Washington to pay attention to the message from WTO Director General Okonjo-Iweala, who made it clear that demonization of China will not lead to reform whereas engagement with Beijing can lead to constructive approaches.

Hence, the WTO's mission should no longer be hijacked by hegemonic practices nor should it be crassly politicized.

Hamzah Rifaat Hussain, a former visiting fellow at the Stimson Center in Washington and former assistant researcher at the Islamabad Policy Research Institute, is a TV anchor at Indus News in Pakistan.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 阿拉尔市| 清水河县| 林西县| 贵定县| 大安市| 屏边| 龙陵县| 章丘市| 宁阳县| 桃园县| 溆浦县| 怀安县| 郎溪县| 台州市| 临清市| 交口县| 宁波市| 罗源县| 舒兰市| 柯坪县| 福安市| 乾安县| 秦安县| 喜德县| 霸州市| 开化县| 大庆市| 大余县| 鹰潭市| 全南县| 陕西省| 曲靖市| 苍梧县| 广德县| 岳普湖县| 徐水县| 施甸县| 湘西| 吴川市| 贡嘎县| 漳浦县| 建阳市| 合川市| 贵德县| 晋中市| 寻甸| 申扎县| 华坪县| 雷州市| 扎兰屯市| 永寿县| 安龙县| 玛纳斯县| 大悟县| 昭平县| 高青县| 峨眉山市| 东光县| 宝兴县| 图木舒克市| 江华| 邳州市| 十堰市| 丰都县| 隆回县| 台山市| 班戈县| 梓潼县| 修水县| 克东县| 外汇| 德格县| 昆山市| 临漳县| 阳东县| 尖扎县| 邳州市| 延津县| 荆州市| 奉节县| 郴州市| 罗山县|