男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Global Views

Careful calibrations

By M. AYHAN KOSE/EKATERINE T. VASHAKMADZE | China Daily Global | Updated: 2022-07-07 06:33
Share
Share - WeChat
MA XUEJING/CHINA DAILY

Narrow path for global recovery requires decisive action

The world economy is navigating uncharted waters as it continues to suffer from a series of destabilizing shocks. After more than two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine and its global effects have steepened the slowdown in global growth. A decisive and wide-ranging policy response will be needed to boost growth and mitigate the multiple risks confronting the global economy.

According to the latest projections by the World Bank, the world economy is expected to experience its sharpest deceleration following an initial recovery from a global recession in more than 80 years. Global growth is projected to slow from 5.7 percent in 2021 to 2.9 percent in 2022-significantly lower than the 4.1 percent that was anticipated in January. Global growth is expected to hover around that pace over 2023-24, as the war in Ukraine disrupts activity, investment, and trade; pent-up demand fades; and fiscal and monetary policy accommodation is withdrawn.

In advanced economies, growth is projected to decelerate sharply from 5.1 percent in 2021 to 2.6 percent in 2022. Growth is expected to further moderate to 2.2 percent in 2023, largely reflecting the further unwinding of the fiscal and monetary policy support provided during the pandemic.

Growth in emerging market and developing economies is projected to roughly halve this year, slowing from 6.6 percent in 2021 to 3.4 percent in 2022-well below its annual average of 4.8 percent over 2011-19. Forecasts for the 2022 growth have been revised down in 70 percent of these emerging market and developing economies, including most commodity importing countries as well as four-fifths of low-income countries.

The global outlook is subject to various interlinked downside risks. Intensifying geopolitical tensions could further disrupt economic activity, generate policy uncertainty and, if persistent, lead to fragmentation in the global trade, investment and financial systems.

Supply disruptions from the pandemic and the war in Ukraine have led to a spike in energy and food prices. Food shortages could worsen and spark social unrest, while new, more virulent variants of COVID-19 could emerge and disrupt activity.

Additional adverse shocks would increase the possibility that the global economy will experience a period of low growth and high inflation. In the 1970s, getting out of such stagflation required steep increases in interest rates by major advanced-economy central banks, which triggered a global recession and a string of financial crisis in emerging market and developing economies.

The current juncture resembles the 1970s in three key aspects: persistent supply-side disturbances fueling inflation preceded by a protracted period of highly accommodative monetary policy in major advanced economies, prospects for weakening growth, and vulnerabilities in emerging economies to the monetary policy tightening that will be needed to rein in inflation.

However, the current global environment also differs from the 1970s in multiple dimensions. The percentage increases in commodity prices are smaller. Labor markets are also much more flexible, reducing the likelihood of price-wage spirals becoming entrenched. In addition, the energy intensity of activity has fallen considerably since the 1970s, making the global economy more resilient to energy supply shocks.

More importantly, unlike the 1970s, central banks in advanced economies and many emerging markets now have clear mandates for price stability, and, over the past three decades, they have established a credible track record of achieving their inflation targets. As a result of improvements in monetary policy frameworks, long-term inflation expectations have become much less sensitive to sudden changes in inflation.

While somewhat less affected than other regions, East Asia and the Pacific is not immune to the global slowdown. Growth in the region is projected to decrease to 4.4 percent in 2022-0.7 percentage points lower than forecasts in January. Higher global commodity prices are contributing to inflation and widening current account deficits in some countries with high dependence on food and energy imports. Meanwhile, China's growth has been hit by renewed outbreaks of COVID-19, with supply chain disruptions and weakening import demand moderating trade flows across the region. External financing conditions have tightened, and risk premiums have edged up following faster-than-expected monetary policy tightening in the United States. Growth in the region is projected to stabilize at an average of 5.2 percent in 2023-24, but the recovery will remain incomplete in many countries.

Against this gloomy background, the path for a sustained recovery is becoming increasingly narrow, requiring decisive global and national policy actions. This will involve global efforts to limit the harm to those affected by the war in Ukraine, to cushion the blow from surging oil and food prices, to speed up debt relief, and to expand vaccinations in low-income countries.

It will also involve refraining from distortionary policies such as price controls and export bans, which could worsen the recent increase in commodity prices. The challenging combination of higher inflation, weaker growth, tighter financial conditions, and limited fiscal policy space will also require reprioritizing spending toward targeted relief for vulnerable populations.

The narrow path to recovery will once again test the resilience of the global economy. It is not easy to quickly implement these policy prescriptions. However, delaying the necessary measures would have painful consequences. Policymakers need to act now to carefully calibrate policies, design credible macroeconomic frameworks, and clearly communicate the measures they plan to implement.

M. Ayhan Kose is chief economist and director of the World Bank's Prospects Group. Ekaterine T.Vashakmadze is senior country economist of the World Bank's Prospects Group. The authors contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Contact the editor at editor@chinawatch.cn

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 康保县| 彭州市| 绵竹市| 建瓯市| 瑞金市| 汕头市| 舟山市| 曲沃县| 漯河市| 申扎县| 迁安市| 二连浩特市| 翁牛特旗| 襄汾县| 炉霍县| 奎屯市| 广安市| 灵山县| 武鸣县| 赣榆县| 宣恩县| 额敏县| 泽州县| 绍兴市| 上饶县| 阳山县| 葵青区| 晴隆县| 郎溪县| 英山县| 蚌埠市| 寿光市| 河池市| 武平县| 沙田区| 宿松县| 盐边县| 板桥市| 新巴尔虎左旗| 静乐县| 五指山市| 聂拉木县| 鸡西市| 安丘市| 姜堰市| 平潭县| 绥德县| 石渠县| 潜江市| 冀州市| 资中县| 大化| 苏州市| 昌吉市| 阿克| 洪江市| 南通市| 龙门县| 太白县| 象州县| 肥城市| 象州县| 扎兰屯市| 扬州市| 乌鲁木齐县| 吉林省| 乌什县| 武乡县| 百色市| 阿拉善左旗| 湘乡市| 榕江县| 乌拉特前旗| 正镶白旗| 镇康县| 成安县| 内黄县| 霞浦县| 台安县| 封开县| 登封市| 通辽市|