男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Global Lens

History of anti-fascist war still inspiring today

By Nikita Lomagin and Igor Khodachek | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2025-05-09 07:34
Share
Share - WeChat
Aircraft fly in formation on Monday over Red Square in Moscow, Russia, during a rehearsal for the Victory Day military parade, which will mark the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]

Eight decades since the victorious events of 1945, the memory of World War II is fading with the passing of the heroes who fought the fascist forces. However, there has been no letup in the debates on the war's history. In fact, the debates are flaring up with renewed vigor, as the memory of World War II is being increasingly used as a tool of political pressure, and to shape alternative historical narratives and escalating confrontation.

Today, trade wars, sanction regimes and bloc rivalries, which remind us of World War II, are further alienating nations, eroding trust, and raising international tensions. These "historical wars" often involve former adversaries as well as former allies.

The experiences of World War II offer a different path, a path of solidarity, mutual assistance, and joint resistance against external aggression. An apt example of joint resistance is the cooperation between the Soviet Union and China during the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression (1931-45).

China and the Soviet Union joined the fight against fascism and militarism as early as August 1937, by signing a non-aggression pact. The Soviet Union provided military aid for China, and after the end of the European campaign, joined the Chinese people's resistance against the Japanese aggressors. Chinese soldiers fought heroically under extreme circumstances, tying down significant Japanese forces that also posed a threat to the Soviet Union in the Far East.

Despite China's internal challenges, the Chinese people's resistance was a key factor in the defeat of Japan in World War II. China suffered huge losses but did not capitulate, setting an example of national resilience. While Soviet assistance bolstered China's anti-fascist struggle, China prevented a substantial number of Japanese forces from advancing toward the Soviet Union's borders. The two sides' mutual support was a genuine partnership, free of colonial dominance or coercion, and remains one of the few examples of relations based on equality between major powers during a major war.

Respectful, pragmatic and strategic interaction and cooperation between the two major countries should be seen as a prototype for a new kind of major-country relations built on mutual respect, mutual benefit, and mutual recognition of each other's core interests.

The cooperation between the Soviet Union and China extended well beyond the military sphere. The two sides engaged in political exchanges, joint economic projects, and cultural diplomacy. Among other things, this gave rise to shared higher education initiatives that laid the groundwork for intergenerational understanding.

A logical continuation of this partnership was the participation of the two sides in the anti-fascist alliance, which was followed by the establishment of the United Nations in 1945. Also, the Soviet Union and China became two of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, which affirmed their status as victors and institutionalized their influence in the new international security framework. And their military cooperation evolved into long-term political alignment, embedded in the architecture of the postwar world.

In the 21st century, as fierce debates on the interpretation of wartime history become part of global confrontations, the Soviet-Chinese cooperation during World War II offers a compelling alternative, because it united rather than divided countries. It demonstrated how the joint fight against fascism and militarism can serve as the foundation of long-term mutual trust — even between countries with different political systems and cultures. The legacy of such cooperation can act as an antidote to "memory wars", a tool for forging shared narratives, and a platform for cultural and humanitarian dialogue.

Continuing this dialogue is essential through joint research initiatives, intergovernmental academic commissions, co-produced documentaries, and shared commemorative events. Such collaboration can transform our shared historical legacy into a resource for cooperation rather than conflict, leading to the restoration of lasting peace.

 

 

Nikita Lomagin is a professor of the Department of History and vice-rector for GR and public organizations at European University at St. Petersburg.
Igor Khodachek is vice-rector for research and director of the Center for Eurasian Studies, European University at St. Petersburg.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 皮山县| 永兴县| 泾阳县| 陆河县| 射洪县| 万盛区| 旌德县| 淄博市| 南木林县| 苍梧县| 蓬溪县| 禄丰县| 房山区| 日照市| 武隆县| 九江市| 泸溪县| 达孜县| 宜宾市| 德庆县| 阿拉善左旗| 泸西县| 鹤壁市| 塘沽区| 沂源县| 阜平县| 七台河市| 黑水县| 阳西县| 苗栗市| 张掖市| 浦东新区| 洞头县| 瑞昌市| 吉木萨尔县| 平湖市| 沁水县| 大渡口区| 尖扎县| 永嘉县| 江城| 读书| 金坛市| 清远市| 名山县| 大埔区| 通道| 汉沽区| 合作市| 神农架林区| 清远市| 辽阳市| 科技| 卓尼县| 大邑县| 甘肃省| 隆尧县| 贵定县| 芦溪县| 延安市| 临沂市| 潼关县| 邢台县| 大冶市| 麻江县| 南乐县| 南木林县| 瑞丽市| 瓮安县| 新民市| 南通市| 泾川县| 温州市| 诸城市| 尚志市| 德兴市| 红河县| 宝坻区| 阜宁县| 措勤县| 班戈县| 浦东新区|