男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Editorials

No reason for Germany to let political expediency hurt relations with China: China Daily editorial

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2025-08-18 20:40
Share
Share - WeChat
Photo taken on July 21, 2019 from Xiangshan Mountain shows the Taipei 101 skyscraper in Taipei, Taiwan. [Photo/Xinhua]

In remarks that seem to contravene the one-China principle that Germany adheres to, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul on Sunday criticized what he called the "aggressive behavior" of China in the Taiwan Strait.

Speaking to reporters ahead of a trip to Japan and Indonesia, Wadephul wantonly claimed that "China's increasingly aggressive behavior" in the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China seas "affects us in Europe", and warned that fundamental principles of "our global coexistence are at stake". He thus called for like-minded allies to counter this purported challenge.

For an official in such an important capacity as his to speak so mindlessly on a question that concerns China's core interests is at best a sign of pathetic ignorance, at worst evidence of an ill intent to enhance Germany's relations with other countries at the cost of the Sino-German relationship.

As a main trading partner of China, with close economic ties, Germany should assess the situation wisely, recognize the broader trends, and not blindly parrot Washington's words.

It is ill-perceived and even egregious to try to describe the necessary, legal and justified measures China has taken, or is compelled to take, to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity as "aggressive".

The top German diplomat is apparently blind to the fact that the secessionist-minded Democratic Progressive Party authorities on the island have in recent years intensified their efforts to incite confrontation across the Taiwan Strait and solicited the support of external forces in a bid to seek "independence" in a more provocative manner.

Also, some regional countries are relying on external forces to muddy the waters in the East and South China seas for their own narrow ends.

Demonstrably, China upholds a foreign policy of peaceful development, and is committed to resolving the territorial disputes with some of its neighbors through dialogue and consultation so as to maintain regional peace and stability. For Wadephul to try to hype up "China threat" in a bid to strengthen Germany's relations with other countries is both politically shortsighted and extremely irresponsible.

As Germany's foreign minister, Wadephul should know better than politicians from some other countries the significance of national reunification for a country, and he certainly knows that the one-China principle is the foundation for the stable and sound development of Sino-German relations.

Thus his ill-judged remarks aimed at exploiting China's internal affairs and its disputes with neighboring countries are a typical example of political expediency. They will unnecessarily have a negative impact on bilateral relations.

In an era marked by geopolitical tensions and economic cooperation, the partnership between China and Germany stands as a crucial pillar of global stability and prosperity.

Yet what Wadephul has said, if it reflects government policy, risks undermining this mutually beneficial relationship.

There is no denying that differences do exist between the two countries. However, there are no security conflicts between China and Germany. It is imperative that the two countries continue to pursue a stable and sound partnership by recognizing their shared interests and the broader significance of their cooperation.

Both nations have articulated a commitment to maintaining a robust partnership. Beijing has repeatedly emphasized the strategic and global significance of China-Germany and China-European Union relations, advocating a relationship based on mutual respect, shared interests and win-win cooperation. While German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has expressed his desire to deepen the Sino-German all-round strategic partnership and his willingness to enhance bilateral cooperation with China.

The differences between China and Germany should not overshadow the immense potential for cooperation. By focusing on mutual interests, expanding economic collaboration and maintaining open lines of communication, China and Germany can contribute to stability in an uncertain world. This partnership is not only in their own interests but also in the interest of a more balanced and harmonious global order.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 曲麻莱县| 苍山县| 吴桥县| 四川省| 托克逊县| 武安市| 嵩明县| 闽清县| 宁安市| 色达县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 香港| 梅河口市| 山阳县| 惠安县| 宝清县| 凤阳县| 阳高县| 奈曼旗| 威宁| 兴文县| 东源县| 隆尧县| 莫力| 麻栗坡县| 武城县| 永靖县| 富顺县| 图片| 诸城市| 平果县| 合作市| 皮山县| 当阳市| 南召县| 当阳市| 潜江市| 罗山县| 贵阳市| 社旗县| 龙泉市| 麻阳| 吴川市| 长岭县| 雷山县| 淳安县| 柯坪县| 漳浦县| 凯里市| 晋州市| 林甸县| 海盐县| 五指山市| 喀喇| 徐州市| 兴化市| 长子县| 通辽市| 安国市| 镶黄旗| 涡阳县| 乌鲁木齐县| 临猗县| 浠水县| 霍城县| 淮北市| 宝坻区| 东安县| 肥乡县| 卢龙县| 建瓯市| 菏泽市| 韶关市| 湖南省| 鸡东县| 高青县| 马鞍山市| 平原县| 昌平区| 沂源县| 读书| 濮阳市|