男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Sealing of drug-use records aids social rehabilitation

By Cao Yin | China Daily | Updated: 2025-12-05 08:59
Share
Share - WeChat
A police officer leads a sniffer dog to search narcotics during a presentation event at a university in Shijiazhuang, North China's Hebei province, June 26, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

A recent legal provision mandating the sealing of administrative penalty records, particularly in relation to narcotics use, has become a hot topic of discussion in China. Part of the revised Law on Penalties for Administration of Public Security, the new law — which takes effect on Jan 1 — stipulates that records of violations should be sealed and not disclosed to any organization or individual, except in case of inquiries conducted in line with regulations.

Many netizens worry that the rule might condone drug use or provide a pathway for offenders to "cleanse" their records.

The public's reaction, on the one hand, shows the importance people place on drug-related cases; on the other, it reveals a gap between professional knowledge and public understanding.

In China, if someone engages in inappropriate behavior that is not severe in nature and does not harm others or society, the police can impose administrative penalties, including issuing warnings, fines or detention for no more than 15 days, in accordance with the law.

For example, individuals found in possession of small amounts of drugs, using drugs, or deceiving doctors into prescribing narcotics or psychoactive drugs face administrative detention of up to 15 days or fines of up to 3,000 yuan ($424.72). In essence, the law does target first-time or accidental drug users, who are considered both violators and victims, posing relatively minor damage to others and society.

However, if the circumstances are severe, such as possessing large quantities of drugs or engaging in drug trafficking, it constitutes a crime under the Criminal Law, and will result in imprisonment and/or other criminal punishments on conviction.

In 2014, one of two celebrities involved in a drug-related case was detained for 14 days for drug use, while the other faced prosecution because he not only took drugs but also provided a platform for other people to do so. This demonstrates that China has never turned a blind eye or condoned drug-related behavior, but rather categorizes and punishes individuals on the basis of specific circumstances and the severity of the crime.

The decision to seal administrative penalties, therefore, is to help people who commit minor offenses and show genuine remorse integrate into society. Previously, many such people faced setbacks when it came to education, or in finding jobs as employers required a clean criminal record. In the absence of sealing requirements, some public security agencies allowed access to or provided the administrative penalty records. This infringed on the privacy of individuals while also discriminating against them for relatively minor offenses.

The new rule imposes a uniform requirement on public security departments nationwide, meaning that they can provide administrative penalty records only for the sake of investigation or in accordance with national regulations. Moreover, sealing records does not mean deleting them, nor does it weaken the management of drug users.

China has maintained a "zero-tolerance" policy against violations and crimes involving drugs, conducting classified assessment and management of drug-related individuals. As of the end of May, there were 710,000 drug users across the country, more than 4.33 million had been drug-free for three years without relapse.

Besides, under various laws and regulations in China those applying for certain positions, such as ride-hailing drivers, kindergarten teachers and security guards, must provide proof of no drug use. Under the new rule, employers in these industries can check with the public security agencies.

Building a law-based society demands not only knowledge of the law but also timely response to public concerns. When a topic sparks controversy and debate, it signifies public interest and engagement. Such discussions naturally lead to differing opinions. Only by continuously enhancing communication and reaching a consensus can we ensure that legal policies and measures are effectively implemented, ultimately benefiting the wider public.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 麟游县| 龙川县| 如皋市| 军事| 常德市| 合川市| 惠安县| 眉山市| 西安市| 南乐县| 福州市| 进贤县| 奈曼旗| 顺昌县| 西盟| 勃利县| 南华县| 酒泉市| 乐都县| 临桂县| 河池市| 余庆县| 毕节市| 安阳县| 花垣县| 德清县| 关岭| 贵阳市| 应用必备| 汾阳市| 漳平市| 读书| 舟曲县| 大港区| 宁夏| 开原市| 秦皇岛市| 和平区| 揭阳市| 苏尼特左旗| 香格里拉县| 南丰县| 清镇市| 垫江县| 天津市| 东乡县| 衡东县| 阿拉善右旗| 石棉县| 绥棱县| 信宜市| 赤峰市| 工布江达县| 潮州市| 云霄县| 富平县| 临沭县| 安西县| 景洪市| 赤壁市| 临桂县| 辉县市| 宜阳县| 姜堰市| 渝北区| 远安县| 龙里县| 资兴市| 鹿邑县| 越西县| 新安县| 博乐市| 微山县| 全南县| 肃南| 兰考县| 太湖县| 高州市| 夏邑县| 巴楚县| 丹巴县| 资源县|