男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影

Opinion

Taxpayers' concerns

(China Daily)
Updated: 2011-05-11 14:27
Large Medium Small

It surely speaks volumes about China's progress on open and democratic lawmaking that more than 200,000 opinions - a record - were offered by the public on proposed revisions to the country's law on levying personal income tax.

Since the National People's Congress Standing Committee, the top legislature, publicized the amendment of the Personal Income Tax Law, the draft law has attracted more opinions from the public than all of the previous 20 laws put forward for public opinion since 2009.

Such an advancement in participative legislation can be partly credited to the increasingly wider access to the Internet and the growing awareness of it as a platform for their concerns among Chinese people.

What is also obvious is the public's growing enthusiasm for participating in legislative issues.

Nevertheless, surely the main reason for the unprecedented public response is citizens' concerns about personal tax relief, which is no longer enough to absorb the rising cost of living.

Related readings:
Taxpayers' concerns Current tax rate is too high, Chinese say
Taxpayers' concerns Tax threshold changes prompt record feedback
Taxpayers' concerns Income tax amendment draws?heavy responses
Taxpayers' concerns China's macro tax burden too heavy: Report

The original proposal, submitted by the State Council, was to increase the income tax threshold from 2,000 yuan ($307.7) to 3,000 yuan per month and to reduce the number of income tax brackets. The finance minister explained to the top legislature the benefits the draft law offered wage-earners and the burden it will impose on the national coffers.

However, as a much-touted government effort to offer tax relief to Chinese wage-earners, especially from low-income households, the draft did not go down well with the nation's lawmakers, who decided that more public opinion was required.

Admittedly, a final analysis of the public's responses, which are still coming in, will not be available till the end of this month. Yet, it is not hard to guess, from some of the responses, what Chinese taxpayers think about the proposal.

Some residents in major Chinese cities have cast doubts on the calculation of living costs that the finance ministry used to justify the proposed tax relief. The official national average housing expenditure seems to account for merely a small faction of what many people actually pay to live in their homes.

Others have raised questions about the shortsightedness of the proposed tax threshold of 3,000 yuan. Official data already show that the average burden of monthly consumption expenditure for each urban worker reached 2,167 yuan last year. The double-digit rise of income levels across the country, which is expected to continue in coming years, will soon require Chinese legislators to review the law all over again.

If such concerns prove the general view among the public, lawmakers should not hesitate to make substantive changes to the draft law.

分享按鈕
主站蜘蛛池模板: 洛宁县| 松阳县| 漳州市| 观塘区| 赤壁市| 桓仁| 遂昌县| 金山区| 偏关县| 泸西县| 鹤山市| 射阳县| 邮箱| 咸阳市| 宜昌市| 鲁甸县| 和平县| 汶川县| 安康市| 威信县| 苍溪县| 秭归县| 浮梁县| 东城区| 沙洋县| 井冈山市| 饶阳县| 石首市| 临洮县| 榕江县| 乌拉特中旗| 开封市| 井陉县| 兴城市| 浑源县| 淮北市| 白玉县| 涟源市| 麟游县| 阳高县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 遵义县| 肥城市| 荃湾区| 稻城县| 宁化县| 宜春市| 青川县| 定边县| 儋州市| 三穗县| 安顺市| 汝阳县| 陵水| 潼南县| 武汉市| 门源| 武威市| 峨眉山市| 三明市| 灌阳县| 江达县| 依兰县| 太和县| 普宁市| 吉安市| 纳雍县| 卢龙县| 阳高县| 淮阳县| 汉川市| 嵊泗县| 通江县| 斗六市| 景谷| 盐亭县| 乌兰县| 陕西省| 泰州市| 江陵县| 深圳市| 蓝山县|