男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / View

Income inequality plan a test of will to reform

By Mark Williams (China Daily) Updated: 2012-12-13 08:23

The fact that the government acknowledges the need to do something to redress these imbalances reflects its recognition of the fact that widening inequality is not just a major social concern. It is also a threat to China's ability to maintain rapid economic growth. Widening inequality has gone hand-in-hand with rising saving because the major beneficiaries of the last few years' growth, company owners and their senior managers, tend to save more than they spend. The latest China Household Finance Survey shows that the top 5 percent of households by income saved 69 percent of their income and accounted for 62 percent of total household savings. The shift to a consumption-led growth model, which is at the heart of the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-15), will happen only if ordinary households have more money to spend.

What might an effective plan to reduce inequality look like? At its core would be efforts to steer more of China's income toward average families.

The most effective steps would focus on boosting competition, job creation and after-tax wages. Protected parts of the economy should be opened up to the private sector. Dominant SOEs should be exposed to more competition from private competitors. The banking system and the wider financial sector should be liberalized so that smaller companies can easily access the capital they need to invest. Subsidies to large companies, in particular the provision of cheap loans, should be withdrawn to level the playing field. And the tax burden should be reduced.

These would be bold steps and not easy to implement. Indeed, they would involve wrenching changes for many protected parts of the economy, which presumably explains why the government has struggled for so long to agree on how to proceed.

But sticking with the status quo is not an option. Widening inequality has welfare costs and will undercut any effort to put the economy on a more sustainable path. In contrast, successful reform would have a transformative effect on China's prospects, setting the stage for another decade of strong economic growth.

The author is chief Asia economist at Capital Economics, a London-based independent macroeconomic research consultancy.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 维西| 阿拉尔市| 阳春市| 凌云县| 潮州市| 拉孜县| 安新县| 德清县| 北票市| 米泉市| 渝北区| 杭州市| 昌江| 铁岭市| 余庆县| 连江县| 台北市| 巩义市| 朝阳区| 康平县| 鸡东县| 长宁区| 原平市| 徐汇区| 铜川市| 平潭县| 襄垣县| 平山县| 元阳县| 安溪县| 西宁市| 莱西市| 金沙县| 曲沃县| 怀远县| 苍溪县| 泰宁县| 宁南县| 琼结县| 康保县| 吴忠市| 南开区| 罗甸县| 纳雍县| 东方市| 团风县| 北流市| 顺平县| 习水县| 石台县| 德令哈市| 嘉鱼县| 永春县| 威信县| 五台县| 黔西县| 临夏县| 柳河县| 康马县| 百色市| 深水埗区| 万山特区| 平凉市| 河源市| 宜宾市| 湖州市| 靖边县| 胶州市| 平陆县| 麦盖提县| 井冈山市| 正镶白旗| 安庆市| 瑞金市| 湄潭县| 太仓市| 元阳县| 隆尧县| 沂水县| 天长市| 紫金县| 南陵县|