男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
Make me your Homepage
left corner left corner
China Daily Website

Online notaries are convenient, but law lags

Updated: 2013-12-31 07:05
By Sun Xiaochen ( China Daily)

The emergence of online notarization has brought new hope for deterring Internet infringements, but the fledgling service also urgently needs improved supervision , experts said.

In early November, an expectant mother surnamed Yang in Jiangsu province was intimidated by an online shop owner for giving the store a negative rating after receiving poor quality products that varied considerably from the online description and photos. But neither the trading records nor the owner's threatening words on her computer were legally admissible as evidence because of the alterable nature of digital files, according to multiple media sources.

Yang is not alone as the popularity of the Internet has allowed e-shopping swindles, online slander and piracy to infringe on the intellectual property rights not only of enterprises but also individuals.

The lack of valid and accessible forensic methods for ordinary people in the digital era is an issue, but the rise of third-party online notaries may help improve the situation, pundits said.

"Conventional notarizing requires applicants to present evidence at a real office and takes time and travel expenses," said Feng Xiaoqing, an intellectual property rights professor at the China Institute of Political Science and Law.

"The new technology provides a convenient new means for the public but the relevant regulations lag behind, so the legal effect of third-party notarized documents remains questionable."

Meiya Pico, a Fujian-based digital forensics provider, launched its electronic notarizing app, the CunNar, for Android and Apple systems last year and has seen the service play a pivotal role in solving online IPR disputes.

Users of the app can upload more than 20 kinds of documents including voice and transaction records into a third-party database through a real-name system.

The company, which keeps client data encrypted and unalterable, provides certificates signed by official notaries testifying to the validity of the documents when customers need that as evidence for lawsuits.

"The service makes evidence collection and notarization as easy as possible for people and meets the demand on the Internet," said Liu Xiangnan, chairman of the board of Meiya Pico.

The service has attracted more than 3.7 million registered users and currently provides digital forensics for more than 100 brands.

Citing increasing online infringement cases involving IPR, Liu said he envisioned a digital reform of the traditional notary service soon.

The total annual amount of online trading reached 8.7 trillion yuan ($1.4 trillion) in 2013 and there were more than 60,000 civil cases related to e-commerce and IPR, according to a review released by State Intellectual Property Office.

The increasing demand for more efficient notarization has brought pressure on the country's traditional notary system, which employs more than 20,000 notaries at more than 3,000 offices, according to the according to the China Notary Association.

"In the current situation, rights holders have to visit local agencies to present digital documents, but some of the files might have been manipulated by violators when they are here and it's hard for us to tell if the documents presented are originals," Gong Nan, from Beijing Dongfang Notary Agency said. "So we are looking forward to the new-tech way", which utilizes digital forensics.

However, a lack of clear rules on regulating the emerging service and its legal impact remains a problem, Feng said.

"Issues such as how to monitor the third party's service, who should do so and whether the certificates it offers will be widely accepted should be discussed further," Feng said.

Yu Guofu, a Beijing lawyer specializing in online rights infringements, called for more innovations in the legal system to keep pace with the development of technology.

"The validity of evidence collected and notarized by a third party using the service is more effective than privately obtained data, but relevant rules and supervision mechanism have to be updated in advance," said Yu.

sunxiaochen@chinadailiy.com.cn

(China Daily 12/31/2013 page5)

 
...
...
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 萍乡市| 靖江市| 宣汉县| 鱼台县| 台中市| 阿克苏市| 宁乡县| 阳朔县| 大姚县| 梅州市| 全南县| 武宁县| 德格县| 琼海市| 景东| 阿荣旗| 祁东县| 云南省| 张家口市| 阳谷县| 大悟县| 郑州市| 公主岭市| 枣庄市| 松潘县| 韶关市| 盐山县| 都安| 斗六市| 山东省| 四平市| 南岸区| 阳曲县| 吴江市| 莲花县| 彭州市| 东方市| 德昌县| 隆回县| 如东县| 逊克县| 汨罗市| 靖边县| 项城市| 庄浪县| 朝阳区| 红桥区| 安西县| 永顺县| 中牟县| 大方县| 濮阳县| 景东| 灵石县| 新昌县| 平和县| 烟台市| 桃江县| 郧西县| 依安县| 莒南县| 余姚市| 油尖旺区| 彭山县| 理塘县| 醴陵市| 芒康县| 巴彦县| 雅安市| 聊城市| 澳门| 涟水县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 贡觉县| 云和县| 马关县| 靖边县| 平乐县| 定西市| 呼伦贝尔市| 托里县| 前郭尔|