男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Readers

What's the buzz

China Daily | Updated: 2013-04-15 08:01

The Ancient Town of Fenghuang in Hunan started charging an entrance fee of 148 yuan ($23.68) on April 10, triggering walkouts among some shopkeepers and ferry operators who protested the charge would reduce the number of visitors. Do you support Fenghuang charging tourists? China Daily's mobile phone news readers share their views:

The entrance fee will frighten away some tourists and thus have an impact on local shops in the short run, yet it may be an effective measure to protect the ancient city in the long run. In my opinion, the measure would be more tourist-oriented if the fee was only charged during the peak season to control the number of tourists.

A READER, Guangzhou, Guangdong province

There are many Chinese who cannot afford 148 yuan to visit an ancient town and most of them are students and low-income workers. The entrance fee inevitably closes the door on them and deprives them of a chance to know more about the culture in Fenghuang. Besides, the decline in the number of tourists would also have a negative effect on local shops reliant on tourism. Therefore, I don't think it is a good idea to collect an entrance fee.

DENGDAI, Nanjing, Jiangsu province

I don't agree with such a proposal. The rise in ticket prices for tourist sites has become a unique feature of tourism with Chinese characteristics at present. The development of China's tourism should not be based on increasing ticket prices, but on developing and protecting scenic features to upgrade their overall quality. For most citizens, the high ticket prices spoil their holidays.

A READER, Chengdu, Sichuan province

Although the fee will affect the interests of shopkeepers and ferry owners in the short run, yet in the long term it will help protect the part of our cultural heritage and enable the town to provide better services for the tourists. The introduction of reforms inevitably results in voices of opposition, therefore, policymakers need to figure out better implementation and management.

YUMOTIANYA, Shiyan, Hubei province

I think Fenghuang should collect an entrance fee from tourists, as the money can be used to better maintain and manage facilities in the ancient town, which is conducive to its long-term development. But when charging such fees, two things should be noted: The ticket price should be reasonable, as over-priced tickets will only drive away tourists, and the fees should be strictly used to improve the management and maintenance of the ancient town, instead of being profits for anyone.

XIAOXIAMI, Fuzhou, Fujian province

I am against such an entrance fee. If the ancient city is only open to tourists for a fee, it will only become a scenic spot with a combination of old and newly constructed buildings and lose the cultural connotations that are most attractive to people. Introducing an entrance fee means these are very likely to disappear, and Fenghuang will become a mere theme park.

FEITIAN, Shanghai

(China Daily 04/15/2013 page9)

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 嘉荫县| 曲沃县| 吐鲁番市| 灵石县| 独山县| 建湖县| 成都市| 邻水| 吉首市| 仪征市| 迁安市| 海口市| 舟曲县| 苍山县| 墨竹工卡县| 廉江市| 越西县| 礼泉县| 岗巴县| 巴中市| 凭祥市| 莲花县| 岑巩县| 宜兰县| 阳江市| 绥江县| 信宜市| 揭西县| 山丹县| 天台县| 舒城县| 镇沅| 炎陵县| 紫云| 晋宁县| 盐亭县| 高陵县| 桂阳县| 兴业县| 泰宁县| 河西区| 都兰县| 卫辉市| 平武县| 奉贤区| 资溪县| 成安县| 涟水县| 景谷| 泾阳县| 沈丘县| 丹寨县| 类乌齐县| 和硕县| 麟游县| 宜丰县| 静宁县| 郑州市| 平安县| 吴川市| 平乡县| 延津县| 湘潭县| 澄城县| 温泉县| 板桥市| 玉溪市| 白水县| 韶山市| 股票| 阿拉善盟| 边坝县| 沁水县| 阿拉尔市| 罗源县| 保山市| 丰镇市| 灵武市| 荔波县| 宜章县| 金寨县| 平遥县|