男女羞羞视频在线观看,国产精品黄色免费,麻豆91在线视频,美女被羞羞免费软件下载,国产的一级片,亚洲熟色妇,天天操夜夜摸,一区二区三区在线电影
US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Editorials

Exam questions remain

(China Daily) Updated: 2014-09-09 07:16

The latest rerorm to the gaokao, or national college entrance examinations, will be the biggest-ever change to the way students are enrolled by universities since 1978. Under the reform, the final scores of three courses students take during their high school years will be used in the appraisals of candidates for college enrollment.

The measure is to be implemented on a trial basis in Shanghai and East China's Zhejiang province for two years before being rolled out nationwide in 2017. Apart from Chinese, math and English that will remain in the national exam, students will be able to choose three out of six designated courses to be used in their high school appraisals.

Will the move strike a balance between fairness and the efficient selection of desirable candidates?

It should, but only if it is carried out as its designers expect. However, it is not certain that the reform will not be compromised or even bent in the process of implementation.

The current examinations have long been criticized for ignoring the overall quality of candidates and been condemned as the major culprit for the rampancy of rote learning in high schools.

Other alternatives, such as extra scores for candidates judged to have moral integrity or special talents in a particular field, such as sports, and mandates given to universities to enroll students on their own, have turned out to be a source of corruption. Some schools sell the extra marks to parents willing to buy them, and some of those in charge of enrolling students at universities take bribes from parents who are willing to buy their children's admission into a prestigious university.

The new reform, although designed with a view to changing the entire process for greater fairness and the selection of those candidates with the best overall qualities, does leave questions that need to be answered.

Will the teachers in charge of a class or school principals or the combination of two give the final appraisals of a student's overall quality? What if some parents get a good appraisal for their children by bribing teachers or principals? What if some teachers or principals take this as a money-making opportunity? What if some parents bribe teachers to allow their children to cheat in examinations for the three courses they choose for their college entrance assessment?

The reform, although it is heading in the right direction, still faces a lot of uncertainties and has many difficulties to overcome before it can be claimed to be a success.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 冷水江市| 东光县| 永州市| 永靖县| 南漳县| 灌南县| 揭东县| 专栏| 诸城市| 建湖县| 呼伦贝尔市| 客服| 会理县| 临汾市| 犍为县| 昭觉县| 西盟| 邵武市| 普格县| 客服| 谷城县| 阳谷县| 高邑县| 井研县| 南乐县| 乾安县| 兰州市| 镇江市| 榆中县| 绍兴县| 乐山市| 井研县| 广州市| 林芝县| 怀宁县| 安吉县| 太湖县| 贵港市| 潢川县| 营口市| 大田县| 平泉县| 宁南县| 含山县| 成安县| 怀宁县| 平顺县| 辽源市| 平舆县| 陇川县| 盐池县| 神池县| 都昌县| 梨树县| 博兴县| 青铜峡市| 于都县| 榆中县| 西宁市| 金阳县| 芜湖市| 云阳县| 海兴县| 宝应县| 潮安县| 历史| 禄劝| 阜平县| 谷城县| 锦屏县| 福海县| 建始县| 井研县| 越西县| 鲁甸县| 栾川县| 云和县| 金川县| 张掖市| 定日县| 南和县| 抚州市|